Posted on 03/22/2012 6:06:05 AM PDT by NYer
wow.
So basically, the Catholic Church might have done none of them.
Again, referencing the text from this article:
From 1938 to 1968 in the Netherlands, after a decade of debates, 400 sex offenders who had been committed to asylums for the criminally insane were ‘voluntarily’ and ‘therapeutically’ castrated.
IOW, he chose castration, not the Catholic Church ... period.
A disciple of Kinsey? Enough said.
Watch the Children of Table 34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vltmeBPKAAo
Absolute Wickedness (Interesting to see the effect across culture, scary)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1VVuraWrMQ
Note: Make sure your kids aren’t around when you see this.
Remember his sex studies affected the social structure, laws, education as well as the church. He and Masters and Johnson were the ‘groundbreaking’ sex authorities, so-called ‘researchers’ and ‘scientific experts’. He spoke They were the case law books re: sexuality.
L v. Texas, others, case in point:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=2135
And culture has never been the same.
I know things about Kinsey that would make people kill themselves. Like other ‘sex’ researchers, they projected their sicknesses into ‘everybody does it’ normalcy. This took a huge toll on soldiers returning home after WWII, after more women were in the workforce and not with the kids. The perverts headed straight for the home, feminism, everyone cheats, kids are sexual from birth (sex ed), the courts, etc..
If the Priests who did the abusing were also castrated for “homosexuality”.
It seems to me that the kid who complained that he was being sodomized was much less in need of castration for homosexuality than the Priest who sodomized him.
But it seems that homosexual pedophilic sodomizing rapist Priests were NOT castrated - just 10 of their victims.
From the NYT article...
“Mr. Dohmen said that the man accused of abusing Mr. Heithuis was investigated but not prosecuted. He was transferred to Nova Scotia, where he started a home for boys.”
A home for boys. How sweet of him to continue his particular affinity for troubled young men! /s
So a guy was castrated, and the reason given was homosexuality, but no homosexual abuse actually took place if we are to believe the investigators. So what was Mr. Dohmen castrated for?
Insidious .. absolutely the proper choice of adjective. I don’t want to know who or how the chart data was compiled.
CORRECTION.
Last sentence should read...
“So what was Mr. Heithuis castrated for?”
Oops, I guess I’m wrong. I presumed this was the same case that had been on Free Republic earlier, involving a priest. In this case, there’s nothing in the article at all to suggest it was a priest who did the abusing. So I’m not sure what the ruckus is about, or how the author suggests that it MIGHT have been punishment for whistle-blowing. Whistle-blowing what?
But since this article makes no reference to a priest, I’m all the more confused why the Church is the target of criticism; its hospitals handled the cases in the same way that public hospitals do, and it certainly is NOT up to Catholic officials to debate psychiatric medical practices.
I hope you realize the media often lie. My FR name is a joke. Did you realize that?
I hope you realize the media often lie. My FR name is a joke. Did you realize that?
I hope you realize the media often lie. My FR name is a joke. Did you realize that?
(Note to self. Never use irony on FR. Never, never, never.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.