Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tcrlaf
From what I have heard and I do not know if it is entirely true, but there is some gigantic aquifer in the North that they would have to drill either under or around to complete the Keystone pipeline. Apparently this has all the hippies and tree huggers up in arms and they are the ones who control the energy agendas of this administration. This may be at least one reason why he is only approving it halfway.
53 posted on 03/22/2012 12:46:29 PM PDT by 3rdcoastislander (Northern Mexico......aka South Texas.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: 3rdcoastislander
From what I have heard and I do not know if it is entirely true, but there is some gigantic aquifer in the North that they would have to drill either under or around to complete the Keystone pipeline. Apparently this has all the hippies and tree huggers up in arms and they are the ones who control the energy agendas of this administration. This may be at least one reason why he is only approving it halfway.

To fill in the gaps, the northern leg of the Keystone pipeline would run from Alberta, across Eastern Montana and Western Nebraska -- where it would pass thru the Sandhills to join an existing leg in Eastern Nebraska.

The Nebraska Sandhills are the primary water source for the Ogallala Aquifer -- which flows under Western Kansas, Western Oklahoma and irrigates crops in West Texas.

The enviros claim that a pipeline rupture in the Sandhills would pollute the aquifer. Two problems with that:

a. Oil floats on water -- any rupture would stay on the surface and not enter the aquifer.

b. There are already five or six other pipelines that cross the Nebraska sandhills. To my knowledge, no ruptures (or pollution of any sort) have occurred.

It's all environmental BS. And Obama doesn't want to go against his wacko base.

We won't be getting 700,000 bpd of Canadian and Bakken oil (boosting our supply by fully 8%) because the President is playing politics with what is clearly a hugely beneficial economic opportunity.

56 posted on 03/22/2012 1:09:39 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: 3rdcoastislander

That aquifer ALREADY has 83 pipelines running across it. Some of those have been in the ground since 1932.

Just another manufactured “Crisis” issue that is back-firing in the Messiah’s face.

And watching his followers just swallow down the new CURRENT TRUTH, without even questioning it, is just shocking.


57 posted on 03/22/2012 1:12:48 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson