Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney adviser's game-changer (Will Mitt fire Drudge/Rhoades partner Fehrnstrom for gaffe?)
VC Star ^ | 3/22/12 | Fehrnstrom

Posted on 03/22/2012 5:04:48 PM PDT by jimbo123

It is typical of Mitt Romney's luck that, on the morning after he all but secured the Republican presidential nomination, his campaign became embroiled in a controversy over a 1950s plastic toy.

On Wednesday, hours after Romney's 12-point victory over Rick Santorum in the Illinois primary silenced most of the remaining doubters, senior adviser Eric Fehrnstrom went on CNN and gave new meaning to the term "game change."

(Excerpt) Read more at vcstar.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ericfehrnstrom; jebbush; mattdrudge; mattrhoades; norinos
Will Mitt fired Matt Rhoades' partner and Drudge BFF Eric Fehrnstrom and risk the wrath of the GoProud mafia?

Enquiring minds want to know...

1 posted on 03/22/2012 5:04:51 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Does anyone see a coincidence between Milt’s campaign making this really damaging Etch a Sketch comment and the GOPe all circling the wagons and calling for Santorum to drop out? I think the everyone knows this is really far more damaging to his campaign than they let on and they are in panic mode to try and mop up another Milt gaff.


2 posted on 03/22/2012 5:11:05 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I am of the opinion that the Fehrnstrom “gaffe” was intentional.

Rehnrnstrom is Matt Rhoades’ long-time partner and their loyalties go back to Ken Mehlman and the Bush RNC, not the Romney campaign. Drudge is part of that mafia. And Romney is their stooge.

The GOP-e wants a Romney loss and a Senate win in 2012. And Jeb Bush in 2016, not Sarah Palin.


3 posted on 03/22/2012 5:16:52 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Yep!


4 posted on 03/22/2012 5:20:29 PM PDT by Guenevere (....Whom God calls,... He equips......Press On Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

It sort of tore down their carefully crafted image of Mitt as the conservative... sort of like a etch a sketch.


5 posted on 03/22/2012 5:22:43 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

If that is true, then why are all the GOPe dope running to every outlet under the sun to call for Santorum to drop out and for the party to “come together”. For crying out loud, BOR is pushing that tonight for the sake of the party. They all think that Santorum as a very slim shot at victory anyway and have discounted him and Conservative voters already in favor of the inevitable Milt win. Why all the panic today?


6 posted on 03/22/2012 5:25:13 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moorings

I took the etch-a-sketch comment to be about strategy and tactics, not about policy or issues. And I’m a Ron Paul guy. It is interesting how each of us brings our own preconceptions to the comment.

The real issue is whether Mitt’s team has any smarter strategy and tactics than the clearly flawed campaigns of the others (including my favorite). A candidate or surrogate can say something innocuous. But if it isn’t carefully worded, the media will twist the meaning to suit their agenda.

Remember the crosshairs on Gifford? Absolutely nobody on the pro-2A side thought for a minute that it was about guns or violence. But the media was able to twist it that way.

Yes there is a double standard. And if we want to win, we have to find ways to overcome it.


7 posted on 03/22/2012 5:31:12 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

So are you saying the Mitt is indeed a conservative and if he wins the nomination, he will not move so far left of the field those on the conservative side will not be able to see him.


8 posted on 03/22/2012 5:38:26 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

The GOP-e want Santorum out and Newt out so they can stop spending money during the primary.

Then you’ll see them focus their money on the House and Senate and let the Ken Mehlman/Rhoades/Drudge/GoProud mafia take down Mitt in the general election.


9 posted on 03/22/2012 5:42:59 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Mitt cant hold his own while the ENEMEDIA is providing cover fire for him.

Is he that DELUDED to think HE can win?


Another easily manipulated illuminati finger puppet is all he is.

10 posted on 03/22/2012 5:45:00 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Mohammedan law every woman must belong to a man will delay the end of slavery until Islam has ceased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

The GOP-e wants Mitt to win the primary and to lose the general election. Mitt is their stooge.


11 posted on 03/22/2012 5:48:46 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
The GOP-e wants Mitt to win the primary and to lose the general election. Mitt is their stooge.

What would be in it for Romney, under that scenario?

the infowarrior

12 posted on 03/22/2012 9:20:57 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

The GOP-e wants a Romney loss

The GOP-E’s that I know are slobbering over Romney. They actually think he’s going to beat Bam.


13 posted on 03/22/2012 9:27:18 PM PDT by Mountain Mary ("This is OUR country and WE will decide"... Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

“....silenced most of the remaining doubters.” Wow.


14 posted on 03/23/2012 3:37:35 AM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick
“....silenced most of the remaining doubters.” Wow.

Especially after Mittens loses Louisiana today. The GOP-e are nuts.
15 posted on 03/24/2012 4:38:50 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Moorings

You miss the story entirely. The etch-a-sketch comment was made by a staffer, not by Mitt. The staffer who made the comment does not deal in policy decisions so much as in how to package the policy decisions made by others.

If any politician (Obama, Mitt, Paul, or township clerk) changes his hair cut or color of clothing or lapel pin, it does not mean he has changed his position on issues. When a cynical politician on the other side does it, we see it for what it is...it is not a change in policy position.

But we are not as clear to see it for those who are on our side ... or pretend to be on our side. And what clouds our vision is thinking that for someone on our side, changing the packaging changes the contents of the package.


16 posted on 03/24/2012 11:32:37 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson