[dirtboy]

You really are an idiot. You babble nonsensically. You make up laws. You make statements about Zimmerman that border on slander (He was trespassing. He had his weapon out).

Guess what - if there were any reports of Zimmerman having his weapon out prior to a physical altercation or the CLEAR threat of a physical altercation with Martin, the cops would have arrested him. You CANNOT legally brandish a concealed weapon without cause.

So you have no proof that Zimmerman was trespassing, only your own conjecture that is clearly contrary to the facts we do know. You have NO PROOF that Zimmerman was brandishing his weapon at Martin.

Yet you continue to make such claims. While completely bastardizing clear conservative concepts of self-defense. And aligning yourself with the liberals and race pimps trying to make political hay from this event.

You are a real embarassment to FR. And you sure as heck ain't no conservative.

[muawiyah]

I did not say Zimmerman trespassed. I simply asked if he, himself, really had a legal right to be there, and could he prove it.

You leaped to the conclusion (as that chill went down your back ~ the one where you realized you'd been found out) that Zimmerman may not be the model citizen you imagined him to be.

You assume entirely too much ~

[muawiyah]

BTW, there's a full 1 minute gap in the recordings where the cops themselves say they have no idea what happened. That 1 minute is where there was "Contact" of some sort.

You come up with a witness............. nobody else has.

[Cboldt]

-- You are a real embarassment to FR. --

I dunno. He's an embarrassment to himself, that's for sure. But the forum seems to be handling the discussion pretty well.

[Wurlitzer]

“You CANNOT legally brandish a concealed weapon without cause”

---

Unless you are Holder’s people standing outside of a polling place attempting to intimidate voters then you can brandish a weapon. Holder told us so.