You first sport. You made the claims, I’m asking for your source.
I just posted the link to the police report on another post. Now you get to back up your scurrilous claims against not only Mr. Zimmerman, but the investigating officers you smeared with your slander as well.
But as I’ve seen, you’re quite the dancer. Dancing around the questions posed to you.
Don't care.
"Was he under the influence of something?"
Don't care.
"What can you tell us about that?"
Not my claim to buttress.
"Why wasn't Zimmerman's weapon seized and held as part of the investigation?"
Don't care.
I'm waiting for your source that the police officers on scene and Mr. Zimmerman were "laughing and smoking" in the aftermath.
That Mr. Zimmerman was never placed into custody, to which, I posted a copy of the police report refuting your scurrilous accusations.
Now, when can I expect you to post the source(s) to your accusations against the Sanford PD officers and Mr. Zimmerman?
“Why wasn’t Zimmerman’s weapon seized and held as part of the investigation?”
It was. It is still in their custody.
Read the police report. It is “Twin Lakes Shooting Initial Report” under the Trayvon Martin Investigation at the link:
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/index.html
“Why wasn’t Zimmerman given a field sobriety test? Was he under the influence of something? What can you tell us about that?”
We do not know that George Zimmerman was not given a feild sobriety test, but if there was no evidence of a lack of sobriety, then there was no reason to give one.
As for the blood alchol test, the police have no authority to demand one in this case, because they had no probable cause to arrest George Zimmerman. Florida law is very clear on this.
Again, read the City Manager’s statement, and you will have a much better understanding of why the City did what they did.
It is on post 5 at the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2863446/posts
It was the prosecutor who told the police that there was no case against George Zimmerman, and that he would not be charged.