Posted on 03/28/2012 6:05:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
FLASHBACK:
The McCain/Palin ticket was up ++4 to 10 pts
in some polls, days prior to Election 2008.
So rather than helping the GOP, Romney and
TeamROMNEY and the RNME (Republican National Media Establishment)
decided
to attack Gov. Palin to throw Election2008.
Romney, and the Van der Sloot RNME RINOs for Obama in 2008
The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"Im told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palins people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romneys former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off .hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
I hope history is right about Obama’s second term and wrong about Romney.
Yes, but odds were against his first term too. Don’t sell him short.
The only thing that can put Obama back in the White House is the total ineptness of the Republican party in picking a qualified candidate.
So far Republicans are shining at that.
We have a liberal from Massachusetts
A nut case
A boy with his foot in his mouth
A brilliant man who couldn’t keep it in his pants.
I go for Newt, but it looks bad for him right now.
55% to 45%, President Obama in 2013.
The fix might be in comrades.
IMHO
I think prominent Democrats are shiite-ing themselves over their polling internals, and are desperately fishing about for some way to kick Barry to the curb.
Michal Savage may be right. The Korean Open Mic incident may be the opening salvo in a backstabbing campaign.
More nanny state voters now than 4 years ago. Obama’s plan is working perfectly.
Not sure how nervous they are...
If he were a white man, there is ZERO chance he would win a second term, but Obama has racism in his deck of cards.
The Republican party headquartered in Washington, D.C. has a long record of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, but let's not overlook the looter class. When half of American adults have been excused from paying federal taxes and millions of Americans get government "freebies," lots of people believe they have a vested interest in another win by the Big Government party and another loss by America.
What history does not take into account is today’s rampant voter fraud.
I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is thiswho will count the votes, and how. - Stalin, 1923
http://lib.ru/MEMUARY/BAZHANOW/stalin.txt
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin
With the media complicit and Holder running Injustice, he will need to lose by a wide margin.
So much is so different and unique to the present.... that I don't know if we can look to former situations as any kind of indicator.
It's all going to be a real crap shoot... I don't think that Conservative candidates have taken enough advantage of how different our current situation is or of what an abjectly poor showing “O” has made.... either by default, omission of mismanagement!! There is a gold mine in reminding America just how badly "O" has done in his first 'term'
” - - - and 10 won the nomination but lost their bids for re-election. “
” - - - only 15 won two consecutive elections.”
________
The sum of those incumbents who won their party’s nomination according to the above quotes is then 25.
In other words, 15 out of 25 incumbents won two consecutive terms, or 60 % of the incumbents got re-elected.
Dictator Baby-Doc Barack then has a 60 % chance of being re-annointed as High Poo-Bah of Obamanation - - -
BTW, I haven’t taken my shoes and socks off to check the math, so if any of my FRiends can prove me wrong, I would be DELIGHTED that you did so.
Didn't zer0 effectively blurt this to Medvedev the other day? Something to the effect of he'll do this and that 'after he wins re-election'?
Exactly. I agree 100%. Obama is a virtual 'shoo-in' for a second term.
Absurd comment. Clinton is a historical giant? He is a midget.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.