Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patton

Yes, that’s a point which must be clarified and emphasized.

It’s not two thousand seven hundred pages of law, it’s two thousand seven hundred pages of CHANGES to existing laws. Not only must SCOTUS read the entire bill, they must examine what and how existing law is changed by that bill - a much larger problem.


20 posted on 03/28/2012 6:58:53 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

Yep - I imagine insurance companies have teams of lawyers going over it, and are still trying to figure it out.

Morover, their risk teams are probably going nuts, about now.

I may be a mathematician, but I am darn glad that I am not an actuary.


22 posted on 03/28/2012 7:07:42 PM PDT by patton (DateDiff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson