Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House has no contingency plans if health law is tossed (the rookie Hussein is clueless)
The Hill ^ | 3/28/12 | Amie Parnes

Posted on 03/28/2012 5:16:25 PM PDT by Libloather

White House has no contingency plans if health law is tossed
By Amie Parnes - 03/28/12 03:17 PM ET

The White House has no contingency plans in place in the event the Supreme Court rules the healthcare law is unconstitutional.

White House officials said Wednesday they remain “confident” that the healthcare reform law is constitutional and is implementing all the provisions of the law.

If the law is thrown out, there's “no contingency plan in place,” principal deputy press secretary Josh Earnest said at Wednesday’s press briefing with reporters. “We're focused on maximizing the benefits of this law.”

President Obama was in South Korea for the first two days of the High Court’s arguments. Earnest said Obama has followed the case through news reports but he’s unsure if Obama has listened to the audio from the Supreme Court.

Earnest said the healthcare law “was originally a Republican idea” and was backed by “the former governor of Massachusetts.”

Earnest also said the law stemmed from a “bipartisan plan and it's one that we believe is constitutional.”

During the arguments on Tuesday, a majority of the justices appeared to be skeptical that the health law’s insurance mandate met constitutional muster. But on Wednesday, the court seemed more divided on the question of whether the entire law would need to be thrown out if the court ruled the mandate was unconstitutional.

Legal experts have warned that while oral arguments can be a good indication of where the court is headed, it is far from certain how the justices will rule.

In his comments, Earnest cautioned that someone who reads into the tough questioning by the Supreme Court justices and the tenor of the case “is not a very good student of the Supreme Court.”

“I would caution against anyone to try and make predictions,” Earnest said. “That's a risky path to go down if you're placing bets.”

Asked about James Carville's comments that a ruling against the mandate would be a good thing for Democrats, Earnest said “Mr. Carville has the freedom to make those kinds of political assessments” but added that he wasn't in a position to do the same from the White House podium.

Despite the solicitor general’s shaky performance before the court, Earnest called Donald Verrilli Jr., the government’s lawyer in the case, a “very skilled advocate” and “one of the brightest legal minds in Washington, D.C.”

Verrilli “delivered a solid performance before the Supreme Court. That's a fact. We feel good about his performance,” he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: commiecare; healthcare; law; obamacare; scotusocareday3; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
That's a shame.
1 posted on 03/28/2012 5:16:36 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They will take to the streets in protest and put the blame on the GOP ,for starters


2 posted on 03/28/2012 5:20:51 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Earnest said the healthcare law “was originally a Republican idea”

Man, if they were spinning any faster they’d fly
away.
Now that my friends is chutzpah.


3 posted on 03/28/2012 5:21:32 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"We feel good about his performance"

DITTO THAT!

4 posted on 03/28/2012 5:21:53 PM PDT by jaz.357 (Newt is nuts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Well Im all for a oval office speech “Effective at noon tomorrow I resign my Presidency “


5 posted on 03/28/2012 5:22:30 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Yes they do.


6 posted on 03/28/2012 5:23:57 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Of course they don't. They trying to create a crisis of enormous magnitude that can be blamed on the GOP.

My hope is that the GOP has a plan that is ready to be implemented.

7 posted on 03/28/2012 5:26:16 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Stand with God and Sarah, the Gipper and Newt will be standing next to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Verrilli “delivered a solid performance before the Supreme Court. That's a fact. We feel good about his performance,” he said.

Verrilli laid an egg defending a lemon.

8 posted on 03/28/2012 5:26:40 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

SO when the decision is released in June or July or whatever the headlines could be “Republican Healthcare Plan Rejected”??


9 posted on 03/28/2012 5:26:40 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

White House has no contingency plans if health law is tossed

Sure he does! He'll ignore the judgement, appoint a "Health Care Czar" and dare someone to stop him.
10 posted on 03/28/2012 5:28:56 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Mitt Romney is SEVERELY conservative - and I'm SEVERELY against giving him my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Hey Amie Parnes: There is a "Contingency Plan." It's "ignore the ruling and do what he damned well pleases." It's worked with the various courts so far (remember the ruling overturning his Gulf drilling moratorium?).
11 posted on 03/28/2012 5:28:59 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (The only flaw is that America doesn't recognize Cyber's omniscience. -- sergeantdave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
(the rookie Hussein is clueless)

Don't believe it for one second. The Dims wanted ZeroKare overturned from the start. Their game plan is to have mandated individual purchase of private insurance ruled unconstitutional. Then the Dims can come back and say "we tried, but thanks to the Republican appointees on the Supreme Court, the only way to provide universal heath care is to tax the wealthy and provide single payer coverage for everyone."

They may not get it next year, or the year after, but they've been going down the path of single payer government run healthcare for everybody since Johnson launched Medicare back in the 1960s. This is one case where the Dims will take the long view.

12 posted on 03/28/2012 5:29:18 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; All

Don’t fall for this.

Daily KOS and MSNBC are already pushing the meme that if Obamacare fails, the alternative is FULL, UNIVERSAL, GOVERNMENT-RUN ‘Free” Healthcare, and they are sure this is winner in the 2012 elections.

So much of a winner that they are already celebrating regaining control of the House and Senate.


13 posted on 03/28/2012 5:30:05 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Of course he has a plan, listen closely, here it is...

“The racist, homophobic, women hating, fear mongering, Republicans have taken your health care. They don’t care about the poor, women, children and the elderly. They want you to die! I am here to protect your rights from the evil Republicans.”

OK, got it, or do you want to hear that again?


14 posted on 03/28/2012 5:30:58 PM PDT by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Hey Amie Parnes: There is a "Contingency Plan." It's "ignore the ruling and do what he damned well pleases." It's worked with the various courts so far (remember the ruling overturning his Gulf drilling moratorium?).

Bingo!

15 posted on 03/28/2012 5:31:35 PM PDT by tpmintx (Problem: The people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who VOTE for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
It's not going to be un-done.

Even if it were, the answers from The Messiah will be along the lines of "this is why I have more work to do. I can put Supreme Court Justices and Federal Court Justices in place to assure "the Middle Class" is not short-changed by these kinds of Interpretations". "We MUST have MORE TIME to help the Middle Class, and make the Rich pay their fair share"

The parasites and inner-city tribal voterbase will come out 95% for Re-Election of The Messiah, and they need SOMETHING to fire them up.

16 posted on 03/28/2012 5:32:07 PM PDT by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
WH Speak to the press about Verrilli:

"That's a fact. We feel good about his performance."

Translation:

We are soooo screwed.

17 posted on 03/28/2012 5:40:53 PM PDT by JPG (Hold on tight; rough road ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He sould just resign


18 posted on 03/28/2012 5:43:16 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The kenyan needs this law to be overturned so that the Republicans don't have it to smack him with before the election and with it gone the left can wail about how they had saved the country but the Republicans on the Court overturned Salvation.

And overturning it doesn't really make any difference because enough necessary portions of the system are still in place in the Finance law and in the various Bailout laws and Tarp. Without those pieces being removed also the whole medical system is still terminal. The Death Panels will still exist. The Bureaucrats will still decide whether you are "productive" enough to get treated.

19 posted on 03/28/2012 5:46:22 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“But, but ... we bought party hats, cake, those little horns and everything!”
Your Internal Revenue Service
http://tiberi.house.gov/UploadedFiles/IRS_Power_Report.pdf


20 posted on 03/28/2012 5:49:37 PM PDT by tumblindice (our new, happy lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson