I was one of the 250 signers of the Petition that was presented to our good Sheriff that began this Investigation. We'll be signing another petition this Sat. to present to our Legislature, AG and Sec. of State asking them to review the evidence and see what can be done about Obama's eligibility to appear on our General Election ballots.
Ought to be an interesting meeting and hope to find out in more detail what was found by the Investigators.
We are expecting a huge crowd for this one!
Please keep us posted.
I wish you all the best, Kate. We’ll be out of town but with you in spirit. Maybe Carl Seel can still get something passed but will Jan veto it again?
I have a question for you. But first I was in the camp that was not interested because I seriously could not see how one could know with certainty what Obama’s true status was.
But I did have suspicions because I saw Obama and his people try to stonewall repeatedly over the years and spend a great deal of money keeping a $10 paper from being released to the courts or the press. Obama also let a military colonel go to prison rather than release his long form BC. Of course I could see smoke and sense there was a fire somewhere in this.
I saw the press use their standard tactic to label anyone with a suspicion or curiosity as a ‘Birther’.
But I kept out of it for the most part until I saw the deconstruction of the released long form BC. I saw the layers and the time stamps used under the software known as Adobe Illustrator. It was clear then the document was forged. It was not surprising to see the press reaction to those saying the document was a forgery. It was the same tactic used on Global Warming ‘Deniers’.
Sheriff Arpaio alluded to a tantalizing finding, the possibility that the forger could be or was identified. It is possible I suppose that a registration number of the software was somehow embedded in the hex code of the image and that a trace could be made to identify who registered the software.
So here’s the question for you:
Assume the image of the long form BC is a forgery. The forger could have printed out the altered document and then rescanned the printed document to get rid of the software evidence of forgery. It would have been the easiest thing to do.
But the forger didn’t rescan the document.
So either the forger was reckless, not bright, or rushed.
Or the forger was a patriot and wanted the document to be found as a forgery.
Which do you think it was? If it was the second case, should we reward the forger for the service they did the country?
Things to think about.
I’ve been thanking God for you then, Kate. =)
Thanks for having the wisdom and courage to make a good investment of your signature!
Please ping null and void, melancholy and LucyT so one of ‘em can ping the rest of us!!! (take notes or record it please....)
Waiting for update ping ......and a big BUMP!
You need to request the presence of all of your representatives so that they can be asked why there has been no action on their part.
I’ll be there ...I was at Joe’s presser as well
Any updates yet? Will it be up on YouTube?