Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
I think it is highly unlikely that HI officials had anything to do with creating the forgery. There was no logical, legitimate "adoption" scenario involved in justifying this forged pdf. HI officials most likely only received an electronic image from Chicago (the source of all criminal acts behind Barry) with layers of plausible deniability for the transmission of the pdf to protect both the WH and HI.

HI DOH places a printout of the pdf in the archive, then takes it out and makes a copy and “certifies” it for the charade of having a lawyer take that copy back to the WH.

What you postulate is a criminal conspiracy with the tacit approval/involvement of the DOH staff in Hawaii, as well as the Governor of Hawaii, and Obama's attorney as well.

Unless there is extraordinary evidence to support this extraordinary claim, I have to believe in the more mundane explanation that the document was created legally through the DOH in Hawaii. The only way I can see such a thing happening is if Obama was legally adopted in the past.

I will mention once again, that *I* am adopted, and *I* have a fake birth certificate created by the DOH in my state. It's fake, but it's a LEGAL fake.

I too can go to court to get my adoption set aside and resume using my original last name.

The key screw-up was failure to flatten the pdf file by the person in the WH entrusted with “releasing” the image to the web.

I agree with you on this.

58 posted on 03/29/2012 10:53:33 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
“I will mention once again, that *I* am adopted, and *I* have a fake birth certificate created by the DOH in my state. It's fake, but it's a LEGAL fake.”

The fact that you are legaly adopted has nothing to do with this case, unless you were adopted in HI in the early 1960’s. I would advise that you drop your continuing claim that your personal adoption has anything to do with Barry's criminal conspiracy to claim HI birth.

YOu have a legally altered BC, not a forged pdf image of a BC. There is no HI statute under which a pdf would be forged to simulate a 1961 LFBC, and in no case would a legal adoption result in the birth location being moved from Kenya to HI, for example.

61 posted on 03/29/2012 11:58:30 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp; bluecat6

The fact that Fuddy has allowed a forgery to be presented as if it was genuine, without saying anything to clarify that, constitutes misprision of forgery and perjury - federal felonies.

I have no doubts whatsoever that the HDOH has engaged in criminal activity. I do agree with bluecat6’s assessment, though, that Fuddy is the one who has jumped in with both feet, although I also believe Okubo could be criminally liable because I believe she knew that Sunahara’s BC# was stolen. I don’t believe they told anybody else that it was, though, because some poor innocent secretary didn’t know to my Sunahara request was related to Obama, so she didn’t send it to Okubo like all the Obama requests were supposed to be and instead followed the proper protocol, checking the database and telling me that there was no birth record under Sunahara’s name in their database at that time. Okubo was the guard-dog who was supposed to intercept anything about Obama and do the necessary obstruction and lying. She knew. Of that I am convinced.


74 posted on 03/31/2012 1:38:58 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson