Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bolton accuses administration of leaking story on Israeli planning along Iran border
Fox News ^ | 3/29/2012 | staff

Posted on 03/30/2012 3:45:31 AM PDT by tobyhill

Former U.S. diplomat John Bolton alleged Thursday that the Obama administration leaked a story about covert Israeli activity in order to foil potential plans by the country to attack Iran's nuclear program.

Bolton, who served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations in the George W. Bush administration, was responding to an article in Foreign Policy magazine that quoted government sources claiming Israel had been granted access to airfields in Azerbaijan -- along Iran's northern border.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; azerbaijan; bhocorruption; bhofascism; bhoislamism; bhotreason; democrats; foreignpolicy; fubo; johnbolton; marxistbrotherhood; muslimbrotherhood; nationalsecurity; nucleariran; obama; obamatruthfile; obamunism

1 posted on 03/30/2012 3:45:36 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Hey Israel and American Jews, who loves ya now?

Mike

2 posted on 03/30/2012 3:48:21 AM PDT by MichaelP (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools ~HS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Bolton is right.

3 posted on 03/30/2012 3:48:38 AM PDT by mkjessup (0bama squats to pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

do not forget they threw arzebajanistan,,stan,,under the bus as well...he is one POS, that’s OK God knows who he is..


4 posted on 03/30/2012 3:48:43 AM PDT by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

TRAITORS ALL!


5 posted on 03/30/2012 3:51:21 AM PDT by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts bolt the Constitution together as the loose screws of the Left fall out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Bolton is usually right. He’d be a hell of a Sec of State.


6 posted on 03/30/2012 4:34:47 AM PDT by ibytoohi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I would hope that Israel will learn who their enemies are and will withhold sensitive information from all enemies of Israel and of the United States, especially from enemies who currently occupy the White House.


7 posted on 03/30/2012 4:48:41 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Exactly why Bibi will not inform us before he moves. Some say that Israel used this airfield bit to test the waters and know for sure that Obama will stab him in the back (after poking him in the eye) and can now do what Israel needs to do without second-guessing. I hope and pray they are right. I can see no way for Obama to leverage national (electoral) support if/when Bibi moves, but we can still expect him to overreach his Constitutional authority and try to put the clamp on us as the aftermath develops.


8 posted on 03/30/2012 5:28:57 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ibytoohi
Bolton is usually right. He’d be a hell of a Sec of State.

Indeed he would be, it's a damn shame that George W. DumbAzz didn't listen to Bolton regarding Iran and North Korea instead of that piano-playing amateur-of-the-hour Condi Rice.
9 posted on 03/30/2012 5:31:36 AM PDT by mkjessup (0bama squats to pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Surprise, surprise! Obama is a traitor to one of our most important allies! This is nothing new. He's a traitor to his own country.

IMHO, someone in the Obama Administration also tipped off the Taliban about the Navy Seals helo that was shot down in Kabul last year. This was in retaliation for killing musloid-progressive hero Osama bin Laden against Obastard's wishes. At least with Israel, no one died.

Don't be surprised if the Mossad engages in a little disinformation vis-a-vis their American counterparts. Then, when Obama tips the Iranians and they eventually discover that the info was false, seeds of doubt will be sewn re: Obama intel. Then, Israel should strike.

10 posted on 03/30/2012 6:30:37 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne; tobyhill
Surprise,surprise! No where mentioned in the Fox article or among the Bolton quotes is WikiLeaks.

Instead of reading articles about the article or responses to the article, it is a good idea the read the actual article

11 posted on 03/30/2012 7:23:29 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ibytoohi

“Bolton is usually right. He’d be a hell of a Sec of State.”

I like to make him a ‘czar’ in charge of cleaning up welfare fraud and voter fraud.


12 posted on 03/30/2012 7:25:58 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
I like to make him a ‘czar’ in charge of cleaning up welfare fraud and voter fraud.

Or how about appointing him to be Czar of cleaning out all the Czars?
13 posted on 03/30/2012 8:55:29 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Did you read the article? Try reading this:

"In particular, four senior diplomats and military intelligence officers say that the United States has concluded that Israel has recently been granted access to airbases on Iran's northern border. To do what, exactly, is not clear. "The Israelis have bought an airfield," a senior administration official told me in early February, "and the airfield is called Azerbaijan."

Senior U.S. intelligence officials are increasingly concerned that Israel's military expansion into Azerbaijan complicates U.S. efforts to dampen Israeli-Iranian tensions, according to the sources.

That's not WikiLeaks. That's "a senior administraion official". Bolton is saying that the information in this article came very recently from the White House.

The only information in the WikiLeaks memo is that there is a quiet relationship between Israel and Azerbaijan. The airfield accusation is entirely separate from the WikiLeaks memo.

14 posted on 03/30/2012 10:54:51 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne
It all flows from the wikileaks. You think that an administration official is the only one reading wikileaks

If you want to pick out another part from the article it mentions the Israeli General criticizing Bush over this in 2006.

Let me explain the reality to you. Bolton and Neocons have their foreign policy agenda and I have no doubt that you are also a NeoCon. Hang on, get your man Romney into the whitehouse and the NeoCons will be back in power.

Then you can invade Iran and nuke Russia on the same day.

15 posted on 03/30/2012 12:15:36 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

What is your definition of a neo-con? Is it simply a conservative who supports a strong national defense, and being a reliable ally? Or do you mean something else?


16 posted on 03/30/2012 3:21:06 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl
I'm not the one who defines NeoCons, but generally you would say that anyone that subscribes to a particular set of foreign policies aka a particular doctrine generally known as the NeoCon foreign policy doctrine is a NeoCon.

Sometimes you can define NeoCons or the NeoCon doctrine in absolute terms or you can define relative to other foreign policy doctrines.

So, in absolute terms, we can say that one componant (among many) of the NeoCon doctrine is based on the premise that the US won the cold war, and is the last remaining superpower, thus the US is the world hegemon.

Or, relative to another foreign policy group such as the Liberal Interventionists, we can say that NeoCons and Liberal Interventionists have a very idealistic view of foreign policy in that they both like to use humantarianism and nation building in foreign policy. But the Liberal Interventionists and the NeoCons differ in that the Liberal Interventionists are mutilateralists and the NeoCons are unilateralists.

17 posted on 03/31/2012 5:09:13 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson