Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From the Harper Conservatives, a budget that dials back the role of government
The Globe and Mail ^ | March 39, 2012 | bill curry AND jeremy torobin

Posted on 03/30/2012 4:36:13 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian

With his first majority budget, Stephen Harper has laid bare his vision for the future Canada: Government will be smaller and less intrusive, individuals will take more responsibility for their own retirement and business will return to driving the economy.

The 2012 budget is a showcase for Mr. Harper’s hands-off political approach, one that combines sweeping spending cuts to the public service with a handful of targeted policy changes geared to drive future investment.

(Excerpt) Read more at theglobeandmail.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: budget; canada; finance
Wow.

A country where the adults are truly in charge. PM Harper plans to cut federal workers, cut federal spending and make the government smaller and less intrusive.

Go to the link and read all the articles. It is truly amazing. This FPC is very happy to be living in the most conservative country in the world.

The biggest problem these guys are going to have is keeping the Canadian dollar within sight of the US dollar. I don't know how they plan on pulling that one off.

1 posted on 03/30/2012 4:36:21 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

This is great news - I will turn into Sun News (Canada’s new truly conservative news channel that makes Fox look weak and scared) and find out more.

I love our Prime Minister.


2 posted on 03/30/2012 4:41:28 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
Check out this excerpt from the article:

On natural resources, the government is clearing away regulatory hurdles to drive Canada’s energy sector and stepping up its battle with oil industry opponents.

While Obama battles the oil industry, Canada battles oil industry opponents.

Capital and people are going to be flowing into this country. Let the arabs close the Persian Gulf, who cares, we've got oil and we are going to develop it and export it.

3 posted on 03/30/2012 4:53:15 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...

-


4 posted on 03/30/2012 4:59:00 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Please invade us. I welcome our new conservative overlords!


5 posted on 03/30/2012 5:02:11 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
I know you are kidding, but let's look at this in practical terms. We couldn't afford to pay for you entitlement programs. Also, the deficit you are running would kill investment and send the economy into a tailspin.

Wait a minute....

6 posted on 03/30/2012 5:06:15 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Just hearing on Sun that it’s a very modest budget. They called it lame. Cuts not deep enough, small increases in spending. It gets a B from economists, but the conservative base not happy.

It does seem to be a start, but they should have made use of their majority and slashed away. OTOH, better than the liberal alternative!

I am impressed with the determination to get the oil flowing - and Alberta seems to be heading for a Wildrose party....good news.


7 posted on 03/30/2012 5:08:52 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

I suggested that, rather than screw up two perfectly good countries, all conservatives should move to one, all libs to the other, and let the best system win. It wouldn’t take long for the lib country to dry up and be taken over by the prosperous and strong conservative winner!


8 posted on 03/30/2012 5:11:47 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

Thats great news because if Barry gets four more years and declares martial law a lot of Americans will be trying to move there.


9 posted on 03/30/2012 5:12:40 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

Our company did roughly 1/3 of our business in Canada last year, and it is likely to increase the way this year is going.

Canada is headed in the right direction, while we are going the same route that failed in Albania and the Ukraine.


10 posted on 03/30/2012 7:05:59 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
They are somewhat constrained economically, think of it this way.

Two countries, Country A and Country C. They both issue currency and these currencies trade today roughly at par. Country A is 10 times bigger than Country C, with all that portends. Country A is running a huge trade deficit, a huge budget deficit, has a huge debt overhang and is retarding all investment but especially in the energy sector. The only thing standing between this country and complete economic collapse is that its currency and debt instruments are seen as "safe" in a troubled world. Its currency is the primary world reserve currency. Its debt is rated AA with a negative outlook. Country A's government is not business friendly.

Country C has a balanced trade outlook but will probably be running a surplus as its energy sector expands. Its budget is in line and will soon be balanced. Its debt position is good relative to its trading partners and will be falling relative to its GDP. It has a AAA debt rating. Country C is very business friendly and pledges to be even more so. It cannot afford to let its currency rise too much relative to Country A's currency because it will not be able to export as many manufactured goods to its major trading partner and its economy will suffer.

I could go on but you get the idea. The two countries economies are virtually integrated. The volume of trade is enormous in almost every sector.

The problem the Canadian government faces now is how to manage the upward pressure on the dollar as energy exports rise and capital seeks a safe haven. How are the auto companies going to be able to justify production in Canada if the Canadian dollar goes to $1.25 or $1.50 or $2? Play that scenario out across all manufacturing sectors that export to the US.

11 posted on 03/30/2012 7:07:27 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
I'm happy for you, and your felow countrymen.

However, does this mean that yhou will now change your FReeper screen name to

ONCE AGAIN A PROUD CANADIAN

I believe you can change your screen name, and still have links to all your former posts..IOW..not have to register as a new persona, but you have to appeal to the admin mods, and that have to work some magic.

In this case, I bet they'd approve it..

12 posted on 03/30/2012 9:00:20 AM PDT by ken5050 (The ONLY reason to support Mitt: The Mormon Tabernacle Choir will appear at the WH each Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson