Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elena Kagan: How Can Giving a Boatload of Money to Poor People be Unconstitutional?
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | March 30, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 03/30/2012 12:08:33 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: FlingWingFlyer

If the government can force you to buy health insurance it can force you to buy healthy food, it can force you to join a gym, it can decide whether you are allowed to have kids or a snack.... all in the name of “health”.


21 posted on 03/30/2012 12:31:03 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The typical lefty!! Government has no boatloads of money or gifts. The money is being confiscated from 'WE THE PEOPLE' & government or Miss Piggy has no right to gift it to those that didn't earn it.

It proves that if the government is sitting around with boatloads of money - WE THE PEOPLE ARE BEING OVERTAXED!!!

22 posted on 03/30/2012 12:31:21 PM PDT by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Obama’s quotes from 2008. Midway through is “good”, where he talks about how the courts weren’t radical enough, and didn’t break free from the constraints placed by the Founding Fathers. And I pray to God that Obama is losing his chance now.

**************************

“If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples, so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay.”

“But,” Obama said, “The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, as least as it’s been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted.”

Obama said “one of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement, was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that.”


23 posted on 03/30/2012 12:33:17 PM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

hahah Miss Kagan, please allow me to “shop” your house for gifts to give you. I’m sure you will be over joyed that I not only know what you want but have given you it just as “miss placed” your old one.
LoL


24 posted on 03/30/2012 12:33:23 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Yeah, but if you pound two rocks together you can create sparks. The same can’t be said if you pound two liberal brains together.


25 posted on 03/30/2012 12:34:10 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Why is a big gift from the federal government a matter of coercion? In other words, the federal government is here saying: We’re giving you a boatload of money. There are no matching funds requirement. There are no extraneous conditions attached to it. It’s just a boatload of federal money for you to take and spend on poor people’s health care. It doesn’t sound coercive to me, I have to tell you.”

Can we have any stronger evidence this “woman” is incapable of rendering a constitutional judgment on this matter? She’s one of the prime advocates!


26 posted on 03/30/2012 12:34:23 PM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

thank you , very much appreciated


27 posted on 03/30/2012 12:34:26 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman,It's not a conservative view but a true American view)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I hope somebody can get a picture of Kagan today after the Supreme Court “vote” on Obamacare. That would tell anybody what they need to know about how the court is going to rule. Since Kagan is so emotionally invested in Obamacare (many say she even wrote large portions of it), if she looks like she sick to her stomach or just got kicked in the gut, it's pretty safe to assume the court voted to strike Obamacare down.
28 posted on 03/30/2012 12:35:49 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

I saw what you did there...


29 posted on 03/30/2012 12:35:52 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It's called theft, bandita.
30 posted on 03/30/2012 12:36:19 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it and the law is what WE say it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I laughed at this woman when she talked of Federal money like it was a separate entity from taxpayer money.

Federal money that we don't have is borrowed money to be later ripped off the people who make this country work.

Kagen should have recused herself. The SCOTUS will only lose credibility if they allow the opinion of this unqualified hack to stand.

31 posted on 03/30/2012 12:36:51 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Maybe she thought it came off the ‘gobmint’ money tree out behind the WH!! :)


32 posted on 03/30/2012 12:37:15 PM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billorites

33 posted on 03/30/2012 12:38:03 PM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Kagan clearly has no concept of the constitutional issue that the other justices were quick to grasp...if the federal government can compel individual citizens to buy health insurance they can compel them to do anything else and that fundamentally changes the role of limited government in the US Constitution.

Actually, Rush got it wrong here. This quote is from the third day of arguments which had nothing to do with the Commerce Clause or with the individual mandate. The issue was whether the expansion of Medicare was "coercing" the states.

34 posted on 03/30/2012 12:38:48 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Marathoner

” The wise lesbian speaks. A wise lesbian and a wise Latina, isn’t that special? “

Uh..NO


35 posted on 03/30/2012 12:38:59 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I liked her work on King of Queens.


36 posted on 03/30/2012 12:40:00 PM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

-—Why is a big gift from the federal government a matter of coercion?——

Please make it stop. I can’t take it anymore. Really. I can’t.


37 posted on 03/30/2012 12:42:43 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

38 posted on 03/30/2012 12:44:30 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

39 posted on 03/30/2012 12:45:03 PM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Depends on the definition of “special”...

Could be like replying to “how do you like this?” with “interesting, indeed”.


40 posted on 03/30/2012 12:46:00 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson