[justiceseeker93]

Maybe Kagan doesn't want to contemplate the coercion factor in the individual mandate, but she'll understand what mandates and coercion really mean if Congress passes a statutory mandate compelling federal judges, under a penalty of a heavy fine or even impeachment, from sitting on cases in which they had previously advocated for or funded or otherwise worked for one of the parties in the controversy before the Court. In other words, voluntary recusal of a judge should be replaced by mandatory recusal in such instances!

[justiceseeker93]

Correction to my post # 66:

The word "compelling" should be replaced by "prohibiting".

[stephenjohnbanker]

” In other words, voluntary recusal of a judge should be replaced by mandatory recusal in such instances! “

Indeed!

[freekitty]

This woman should be tried for treason instead of sitting on the Supreme Court. Bad people don’t last for long. I suspect she will be punished at the first opportunity. I am hoping George Soros will get his punishment soon.

[GeronL]

Yes, it should be mandatory

[sheik yerbouty]

The 0bamanites think that the law is what they say it is...

[MrB]

Maybe Kagan doesn't want to contemplate the coercion factor in the individual mandate

Liberals, in general, tend to "fail to contemplate" the coercive nature of the policies they advocate for. The idead that they are sticking a gun in someone's face for their own good just kills the "I'm a good person for doing this" buzz.