“Fine. Let’s raise the price of hunting licenses to help cover the cost of damages these vermin do. Doe are over populated and hunters don’t want them. I’ll go back to my earlier statement. A hunter should have to bag two doe before they are allowed one buck. Before they can take a second buck, two more does”
You just don’t get it, do you! You want to charge us who would be doing you a favor in reducing the reproduction rate(sounds like a liberal progressive). Good effing luck, it ain’t worth it! Yada, yada, yada...
Let me give you an analogy that you might understand...you have a LARGE, diseased, unstable tree hanging over your neighbor’s house and you advertise for a tree service firm to remove this hazard, yet when he shows up and volunteers to remove the tree IF he can keep the firewood, YOU want to charge him for the “opportunity” to remove the tree And for the value of the firewood! Just stupid!!
Stew in your own juices!!
JC
That was about the most disjointed, ridiculous analogy I’ve ever read.
Let me explain it to you this way. You folks that are hunting for horns, and states that are catering to you, are doing huge damage to the deer herd and people too. The deer population has exploded and it is up to cars and trucks to bring it under control? The number of deer hunters has dropped substantially in the past 30 years and many are antler snobs. I support letting you take as many as you like as long as you take out some does along the way.
Very few are hunting for meat (I can understand why) . Open up the limits and stop this mess