“Quite frankly, we should have been rioting after Ruby Ridge and Waco. Because we didn’t, the government has gotten bolder and more oppressive, and the average LEOs have even more militarized hardware.”
I’ve read about Ruby Ridge and was sicken by the story. Waco is a little more fuzzy a no doubt serous problem of an overaggressive government, but no where near as sick as the Ruby Ridge murders.
That being said in regard to your remark about rioting, Conservatives don’t riot, and liberals want to be subjects of the government.
There is nothing to be gained in a riot except mindless destruction of what is largely our own property. In the field of forceful resistance the only logical course of conservative is to wait until enough of them are motivated and organized enough as to kick the Government out.
Something that might never be possible owing to our own human scale limits and the enormous size of the overbearing government. Simply put the larger the government the larger the potential to divide and conquer.
What do you think the government would do in the remote case that significant numbers of people starting taking this “sovereign citizen” stance? I know it’s not likely, but at least it’s a realistic course of action and could be done, as shown by those doing it.
You need to learn a lot more about Waco, then. Ruby Ridge pales in comparison, though both were murderous abuses of power. Look up M.O.V. E. in Philadelphia, Gordon Kahl in North Dakota, sometime, too. These have not been isolated events, but a syndrome.
Uh, no.
Uh, no.