Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Check last link in article, Sotomayor's brother is an M.D.
1 posted on 03/31/2012 10:49:25 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: jazusamo

If she is a Wise Latina, I’d hate to see a stupid one.

Just wait for Obama’s next appointment, I guess. Or Mitt’s.


2 posted on 03/31/2012 10:52:18 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Truly a wise latina....
3 posted on 03/31/2012 10:52:18 AM PDT by I am bigjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

But...but...but the state run “media” said she was a wiseass latina that was smarter than a bunch of old white men.


4 posted on 03/31/2012 10:54:06 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (It's time to WEAN the government off of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
This is primarily because physicians, even conservative ones, are as compassionate as liberal Supreme Court justices

Nonsense...we all know that all oil company employees and health insurance workers and all physicians are evil (oh, and financial people too).

It's only liberals, lawyers and judges who are compassionate.

12 posted on 03/31/2012 11:08:13 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

What’s “shocking” about it?

The Wise Latina was incompetent from the get-go


14 posted on 03/31/2012 11:09:31 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Hey "Unifier" and MSM: Demand Spike Lee apologize. OK check. Next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Truth has little to do with “The Narrative “.


15 posted on 03/31/2012 11:09:50 AM PDT by PogySailor (Obama is a SCOAMF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Wise, but ignorant.


16 posted on 03/31/2012 11:11:14 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1166 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Did the Lawyer being asked the question correct her?
17 posted on 03/31/2012 11:11:27 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Interestingly enough, señora Sotomayor is an unfortunate indicator of the difference between an ordinary intelligence, garden-variety latina, and a wise latina.

Apparently, your base-level latina is too stupid to walk and breathe at the same time. This is made clear by the fact that a "wise latina" doesn't have the brains God gave a gerbil. How a mejor burracha tonto is allowed to sit on the highest Bench in the land is appalling. Affirmative Action at its absolute worst and most destructive. The unintended consequence of giving un-earned handouts to the smelly people.

The best we can hope for is an aneurysm erputing in that vapid rental space between her ears. What a completely agenda-driven, brain-dead imbecile.

La Raza seems to come from the shallow end of the gene pool. Heaven help us.

;-\

22 posted on 03/31/2012 11:26:52 AM PDT by Gargantua ("Ich bein eine Breitbart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

What bulls***-she’s not a “wise Latina”-she’s a WITLESS Latina...


27 posted on 03/31/2012 11:30:47 AM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

28 posted on 03/31/2012 11:33:29 AM PDT by Focault's Pendulum (If Obama was any more thin skinned, he'd have a receptacle end: Dennis Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

LOL...I’ve been in that exact situation. My father had lost his job and I had an anaphylactic reaction to a nut back when I was 14. The ER knew exactly what was going on when I got there, and they didn’t even have us fill out paperwork, they just wheeled me straight to the nearest fully-equipped room.

No doctor or nurse cares about insurance in those situations. All they see is someone who is going to die if they do not do something right away. Insurance and bills come in later.


29 posted on 03/31/2012 11:33:53 AM PDT by RecoveringPaulisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

When the libs are putting judges on the bench it’s for a vote and has nothing to do with can they do the job. Sad isn’t it? We need to lose these people.


30 posted on 03/31/2012 11:34:22 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
No person, whether American or not, is ever turned away from an emergency room for lack of health insurance. Ever.

And that principal, that we all are responsible for everyone's healthcare, has led to the situation we are in now. I'm not arguing against it, but I wish someone could figure out how to avoid the ultimate consequence which we are all too close to arriving at, i.e.: if the "government" is responsible for us then it has the right to tell us how to live our lives down to the finest details.

31 posted on 03/31/2012 11:37:22 AM PDT by FairWitness (Everything is easy, once you've done it once)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Her ignorance is a feature to the left.

Since there is a perfect vacuum between her ears, the left can rely on her taking direct marching orders from their top intelligentsia/masterminds. Besides, she can funnel innermost SCOTUS secrets back to the left, as they unfold so that they need not wait for example, till the end of June. When your basic premise is to destroy the constitution and declaration and founding principles of the republic, it furthers your goals by having dolts in positions of power.

32 posted on 03/31/2012 11:38:49 AM PDT by C210N (Mitt "Severe Etch-a-Sketch" mcRominate-me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

What I find is breathtaking ignorance is how the people of the left keep invoking “the welfare of the children”, but have no problem supporting the termination of the lives of children in the abortuaries in poor neighborhoods all over the country.

The left has a hard time convincing people that they really care when they do not care about the right to life.

If life is not valued from conception, don’t make an attempt to convince me you really care about people who happened to escape the death culture of the left.

The people on the left merely use people and situations to achieve their goals of tyranny.


33 posted on 03/31/2012 11:39:04 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Yes it's shocking to realize how uninformed this unqualified Supreme Court Justice is - but hardly unexpected. Sotomayor is on the Court as a political marker for the left and nothing more. She'll rule the mandate 'constitutional' even if James Madison were to come back from the grave to tell her it isn't. Judgement has nothing to do with it. Political ideology is everything to the leftists among us.

What I find scary is that this clueless woman and eight other people in black robes looking solemn and important for the cameras will, with this ruling, help determine the future for America regarding citizens relationship with their government. In reality, just one will, Justice Kennedy, which is even worse. Of course, they may find the law unconstitutional, but we cannot count on that. This is the consequence of electing a left-wing, America-hating radical extremist that was never really examined by the media and was basically handed the presidency by his ostensible 'opponent' (John McCain) and the RNC. Now, the whirlwind.

America is going the way of Europe and by the time people finally wake up, it'll be far too late. This case will propel the decline of American freedom and the prosperity that freedom has wrought. Sadder still, its taken less than a century to accomplish this.

37 posted on 03/31/2012 11:44:15 AM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Oh please! If dying children were being turned away from emergency rooms that is all we would hear about 24 to 7. The MSM would screech so loud they would send the rest of us to the emergency room with busted eardrums.


41 posted on 03/31/2012 11:52:33 AM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
During oral argunment, Sotomayor also incorrectly referred to McCulloch v. Maryland as a commerce clause case. It is not. McCulloch is the second case that every law student learns in Constitutional Law in their first year of law school, right after Marburry v. Madison. She must have been absent that day.
43 posted on 03/31/2012 12:00:01 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo; All
With due respect to Dr. Lee, the Justice's ignorance of health care is not nearly as dangerous to liberty as her lack of knowledge of the Constitution's limits on the role of government--Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary.

Is there not film of her Duke conference remark that the "court of appeals is where policy is made," and then adding, "I know I shouldn't have said that, but . . . ."?

If the Justices get "into the weeds" of the so-called "Affordable Health Care" legislation by such suppositions, ignorant or informed, then they are not adhering to their constitutional assignment as interpreters of the principles of the Constitution.

The Framers of America's Constitution would understand that such an act is not, and never was, about health care. It is about accumulations of power in the hands of arbitrary "rulers," including elected officials, bureaucrats and others whose role is to exert coercive power over the citizens.

Today's Justices should have understood that when the Trojan Horse called "health care reform" and various other appealing titles was introduced.

They are citizens, as well as Justices, and if they want future generations to honor them as advocates for liberty, their opinions must not insult the lofty aims of the Constitution's Preamble.

Hopefully, they will value the opinions of future generations more than accolades from a faction of so-called "progressives" who wish to separate America from its foundations in the enduring ideas of liberty, "changing" it back into Old World ideas from which it came.

48 posted on 03/31/2012 12:10:58 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson