Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ironman
Why would the Chief not consult with the state attorney?

And everyone with half a brain knows that in a potentially controversial case most officials understand it's best to take the cowardly way out (an arrest). Which suggests that they knew they would end up with an expensive prosecution that amounted to nothing, and thought the evidence was already so strong on the side of self defense they didn't have to take the cowardly way out.

158 posted on 03/31/2012 7:39:06 PM PDT by gopcharger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: gopcharger
-- Which suggests that they knew they would end up with an expensive prosecution that amounted to nothing ... --

State law awards damages to wrongly charged defendants, in self-defense cases. So, not only would there be the cost of prosecution (essentially zero for the state, as the prosecutors and judges are on payroll anyway, the incremental cost of trying a case is small), there would be damages to Zimmerman.

Then there is the risk of looking like Nifong.

194 posted on 03/31/2012 8:13:21 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson