THAT makes it worth putting a bunch of people in danger? As a last resort, why can’t they just test for drug residue in the commode? Besides, if you’ve got a lot in your ‘stash’ won’t it take awhile to get rid of it?
And won't the memory of having had to flush your big stash be sufficient deterrent against future drug possession? No-knock drug raids make no sense however you slice it.
If that is the reason for those types of raids, we definitely need address our priorities – is that a good enough justification for putting a number of people in danger?
It’s really just a flimsy excuse for a major governmental overreach at the expense of individual freedom.