Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rawhide

The problem with this is three fold:
* Personal pages versus private pages mean that the page they look at may not be the one in the complaint.
* They may decide something based on a Facebook page of someone else.
* If the person had her pants around her ankles in public, it may not be the fault of the person who posted the picture but the person who put themselves in a compromising position. (If you don’t want pictures of yourself doing drunk stupid stuff on the web, don’t get drunk enough in public to do stupid stuff.)


7 posted on 04/02/2012 5:39:32 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tbw2
If the person had her pants around her ankles in public, it may not be the fault of the person who posted the picture but the person who put themselves in a compromising position. (If you don’t want pictures of yourself doing drunk stupid stuff on the web, don’t get drunk enough in public to do stupid stuff.)

To a bureaucrat, the biggest offense is to make the organization look bad.

The article said it was a co-worker, so likely it was a teacher with union protection. It's easier to make an example of an aide who has no tenure or civil service protection.

Teach your kids to stay off facebook.

31 posted on 04/02/2012 6:08:50 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson