Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: campaignPete R-CT

I would take the lump sum and then work with a tax accountant to lower possible taxes.

I don’t trust the state enough to pay me out over 20 years. If I could trust the state, I would probably take the annuity.


61 posted on 04/02/2012 11:10:28 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

Most financial advisors I found online seem to suggest the annuity option is far better than taking the lump sum option, if the payout is $10 million and above. Just google ‘lottery winnings annuity vs lump sum’ and you will see their reasoning. The are other factors to consider, I’m sure.


62 posted on 04/02/2012 11:21:48 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

there just ain’t no way to lower the taxes on a lump sum.

some question on here whether you can move to TX NH or FL before cashing the ticket. not sure what the answer is on that ... to avoid state income tax.


70 posted on 04/02/2012 2:04:27 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (and I will not go to Maryland to campaign against MITT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson