Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems wage pressure campaign on Supreme Court over health ruling
The Hill ^ | 4/02/12 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 04/03/2012 2:14:46 AM PDT by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Timber Rattler

I agree, let’s just hope that his arrogant speech from a petulant man child is enough to thoroughly piss them off, and in their disgust OVERTURN WICKARD v FILBURN. Abolish 80% of the Federal Government in One Ruling. No that would be HOPE AND CHANGE.


21 posted on 04/03/2012 5:34:13 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; ...
RE :”President Obama was the latest to weigh in when he declared Monday that a wide array of legal experts would be astonished if the court struck down part or all of his signature domestic initiative.
“I’m confident the Supreme Court will uphold the law,” Obama said Monday during a Rose Garden press conference. “That’s not just my opinion but also the opinion of legal experts across the political spectrum.”
He said it would be “unprecedented” for the court to strike down the individual mandate, which requires the uninsured to buy health coverage or pay a penalty.

This is obviously a political message to Obama’s liberal base who didnt like Obama-care in the first place but found themselves rallying behind Obama against the Republican House. Once again he plays the same act against the SCOTUS to rally them.

Note his consistent style : He says is confident that the SCOTUS will do the right thing. He said the exact same thing about the Republican House on that deficit deal he blew up. Call it Phony optimism for political effect.

The legal arguments for upholding the mandate and other parts all revolve around court precedents giving congress power to do mostly anything it wants since Roosevelt. Notice Libs don't see precedents as their limitation, like marraige definition 10,000 years as opposite sex.

This is the obama who claims that DOMA is unconstitutional. Arrogance is his name for sure.

22 posted on 04/03/2012 5:41:44 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : "I will just make insurance companies give you health care for 'free, What Mandates??' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If they throw out the individual mandate, but leave the rest in place, it is the equivalent of the Supreme Court having a Line Item Veto, which they ruled as unconstitutional for the President!


23 posted on 04/03/2012 6:07:02 AM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

2 possibilities:

1) the vote went against him and Obama is desperately trying to flip Kennedy before June

2) the vote went for him and Obama is positioning himself to take credit.

Based on his demeanor and tone of voice I’m going with Option 1.


24 posted on 04/03/2012 6:57:06 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“If you say this is unconstitutional, then you have to say Social Security and Medicare are also unconstitutional”

I can live with that!

I concur that the timing and intensity of this hand-wringing strongly suggest Kagan has leaked word that Friday’s vote went badly for Obamacare.

Of course, all this ex parte lobbying may well backfire, as it amounts to “piling on” after the president’s attempt to publicly humiliate the Court during the SOTU. The conservative justices on SCOTUS well know the Court’s proper role and presumably are deeply offended by POTUS’s unprecedented politicking for a favored result.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but IIRC, even AlGore had the decency to keep his lips zipped while SCOTUS was deliberately during Bush v. Gore.


25 posted on 04/03/2012 7:07:54 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Kagan has already given them the bad news, based on Obama’s reaction here.

IMHO the news was worse than expected.

If this is a 5-4 vote, Obama can spin it as political.

A 7-2 vote, with one of his own voting against him, is much harder to explain away.

26 posted on 04/03/2012 7:16:14 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I wonder if this sort of thing would be enough to make Kennedy fold like a cheap umbrella...


27 posted on 04/03/2012 7:24:19 AM PDT by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Somewhere there is an ugly tree with all of its branches snapped off.


28 posted on 04/03/2012 7:34:54 AM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. Be Andrew Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
A 7-2 vote, with one of his own voting against him, is much harder to explain away.

Even a 6-3 would show that one of the 4 stooges voted against him. I look for a 5-4. Which way? Who knows how Kennedy will vote?

29 posted on 04/03/2012 9:08:56 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Haggai 1, V6.. and he that earneth wages earneth wages to put it into a bag with holes. (My plight))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: formosa

“...We are seeing the left resort to intimidation, personal attacks, and throwing fits on a daily basis now....”

Just wait till after Ø is defeated in November. We ain’t seen nothing yet!


30 posted on 04/03/2012 9:16:09 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (In Memphis on January 20, 2009, pump price were $1.49. We all know what happened after that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
“Obama is just trying to figure out how to play this....and to remind “the new girls on the block” as to how they got there.”

He screwed the pooch now. I suspect his unholier that everyone ‘tude will cause a shift in the court to 6-3.

That guy (0) is the most obnoxious SOB to ever sit in the WH.

Interesting to note that the more he loses, the more irrational he gets.

I am afraid of what he might do,

31 posted on 04/03/2012 9:24:00 AM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“I’m confident the Supreme Court will uphold the law,” Obama said Monday during a Rose Garden press conference. “That’s not just my opinion but also the opinion of legal experts across the political spectrum.”


Translated:
“we have asked the opinion of people from across the spectrum for their opinions. White liberals, black liberals, Hispanic liberals, gay liberals, female liberals, handicapped liberals, old liberals and young ones too. All agree this law should be upheld”

Seriously, he lives in a real life echo chamber.


32 posted on 04/03/2012 9:29:15 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Obama 2012: Dozens of MSNBC viewers can't be wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Obama throws “fag fit” the Bulldyke whispered “You lost” to

him.


33 posted on 04/03/2012 9:42:30 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts

i am thinking the same


34 posted on 04/03/2012 9:49:00 AM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Agree.... Stay safe !


35 posted on 04/03/2012 11:44:58 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701
Just wait till after Ø is defeated in November. We ain’t seen nothing yet!

Maybe you should not count your chickens yet.p> I predict that Romney will not beat Zero, and I further predict that the Zero bill will be upheld, with maybe a ruling against the mandate, which will somehow be passed on to the States.

The reason the bill will stand can be directly attributed to the GOPe.

Just my prediction, hope I am wrong for sure.

36 posted on 04/03/2012 12:14:34 PM PDT by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are most of my comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I love the smell of tyranny in the morning...smells like oppression.


37 posted on 04/03/2012 12:27:47 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat

Not trying to sound like Michelle, but for the first time in my life I am afraid for the safety of the Supreme Court Justices. This President his Commie buddies scare me.


38 posted on 04/03/2012 12:33:45 PM PDT by July4 (Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress," Obama said.

This Motherhugging Kenyan Socialist Muslim Marxist Crack Smoking D**k Sucker (also known as President Barack Obama) knows full well that Judicial Review, which is their precise function, has been the job of the Supreme Court since the country was founded.

Unprecedented???!? This is the use of Hitler's Big Lie premise!!!

Let me give you a feew precedents to the Supreme Court "overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress"

1) Supreme Court Overturns Campaign Finance Law

2) Marbury v. Madison was the first instance in which a law passed by Congress was declared unconstitutional. The decision greatly expanded the power of the Court by establishing its right to overturn acts of Congress, a power not explicitly granted by the Constitution. Initially the case involved Secretary of State James Madison, who refused to seat four judicial appointees although they had been confirmed by the Senate.

And that's just two examples. There are more.

39 posted on 04/03/2012 12:38:55 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America
If they throw out the individual mandate, but leave the rest in place, it is the equivalent of the Supreme Court having a Line Item Veto, which they ruled as unconstitutional for the President!

That's the severability issue, and you're right about the implications. It was also noted by the Court that Congress had a severability clause in Obamacare and then specifically threw it out. So it's not likely that it will be acknowledged as acting. Which means when the individual mandate goes, all of Obamacaer goes with it (which would be true financially even with severability, but the Court will just strike the whole thing outright).

40 posted on 04/03/2012 1:30:48 PM PDT by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson