Crestfallen Liberals Failed to Take Constitution Seriously

Townhall.com ^ | April 3, 2012 | Charlotte Hays

[Student0165]

We have a SCOTUS which takes the Constitution seriously by a 1 vote margin, which is why I will be forced to vote for Romney in November instead of sitting out the election. I’m afraid the next POTUS may be able to nominate judges to SCOTUS and I sure as hell don’t want that POTUS to be the kenyan.

[thethirddegree]

I am praying that the court overturns this unconstitutional infrinement on our rights, and that Obama loses in a landslide in November.

[Tulane]

We have a SCOTUS which takes the Constitution seriously by a 1 vote margin, which is why I will be forced to vote for Romney in November instead of sitting out the election. I’m afraid the next POTUS may be able to nominate judges to SCOTUS and I sure as hell don’t want that POTUS to be the kenyan.
_______________________

Thank you for writing this. People, including me, were upset with the big government things that W. did — prescription drug benefit, no child left behind, etc. W. was not close to being Reagan. That stated, W. gave us Alito and Roberts...and a whole host of lower court judges that respect the Constitution. Believe me, as a lawyer, I can tell you that Obama has appointed hundreds of “doozies” to the federal bench.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Be on guard! SCOTUS and the Constitution will vault to the top of their Enemies List after this.

[Graewoulf]

In the book “Left Behind,“ a snake-oil salesman named Carpathian brings the World to ruin.

Dictator Baby-Doc Barack is our Carpathian as he tries to bring America to ruin.

[Jeff Vader]

yes I feel the same way you do. romney is far from my ideal candidate but he will be a vast improvement over the racist communist we currently have.

[fishtank]

Oh yeah.......

Willard RMONEY McBush will appoint ROMNEYCARE judges.

BIG fat stinking improvement. Not.

I’ll vote third party, thank you very much.

[billva]

We have a SCOTUS which takes the Constitution seriously by a 1 vote margin, which is why I will be forced to vote for Romney in November instead of sitting out the election. I’m afraid the next POTUS may be able to nominate judges to SCOTUS and I sure as hell don’t want that POTUS to be the kenyan.

Thank you for stating what should be obvious to Conservatives but I am afraid that from many comments here doesn't sink in to some people.

[driftless2]

“Constitution!!!???? Constitution? We don’t need no stinking constitution” say the libs.

[Real Cynic No More]

“She’s really sweet, and she makes her own clothes.”

Some of the required phrasing was left out: “She’s really sweet, and she makes her own clothes. Bless her heart!

[infowarrior]

yes I feel the same way you do. romney is far from my ideal candidate but he will be a vast improvement over the racist communist we currently have.

I keep hearing this, then remember the kind of judges Romney appointed in Massachusetts as governor, and feel compelled to ask, "Are you really *sure* aboiut this?"

the infowarrior

[infowarrior]

Thank you for stating what should be obvious to Conservatives but I am afraid that from many comments here doesn't sink in to some people.

What is obvious to many of us, given Romney's track record of judicial appointments as governor of Massachusetts, is the *fact* that any SCOTUS appointent(s) he might make could very well be as bad, if not worse.

Has *that* sunk in to you yet?

the infowarrior

[hinckley buzzard]

The next "POTUS" is likely to nominate at least two in the next four years. Fortunately the radical Ginsberg is the oldest and in questionable health. Breyer is 74, another vicious leftwinger possibly on the bubble. On the other hand, Kennedy and Scalia are both 76.

Say what you will about Romney, with Sotomayor and Kagan we know what a second Obama term will heave up on the beach. This Nation cannot survive any more such demented socialist moles.

[billva]

What is obvious to many of us, given Romney's track record of judicial appointments as governor of Massachusetts, is the *fact* that any SCOTUS appointent(s) he might make could very well be as bad, if not worse.

Has *that* sunk in to you yet?

the infowarrior

Sunk in to me, you need to change your name to something like misinfowarrior.

If Romney is President and a Republican Congress that just isn't going to happen and I think you know this.

I will tell you this, if you and a bunch of others stay home on election day and Obama gets in you will later regret it as you understand what you have done.

And I will also tell you that whatever you and a bunch of others have to say here in the future will probably sway me more the other way than in the direction you are thinking.

Hope that sinks in to you, but I highly doubt anything can penetrate.

[infowarrior]

If Romney is President and a Republican Congress that just isn't going to happen and I think you know this.

That is *not* a given, and you know it. We've gone through this "lesser of two evils" time and again, much to our detriment. When does it stop? Never?

the infowarrior

[infowarrior]

If Romney is President and a Republican Congress that just isn't going to happen and I think you know this.

That is *not* a given, and you know it. We've gone through this "lesser of two evils" time and again, much to our detriment. When does it stop? Never?

the infowarrior

[allmendream]

Considering that what most here would consider to be the perfect candidate is probably unelectable nationwide - I think “the lesser of two evils” will be the most viable option for most of us for the foreseeable future.

Either that or.......

[allmendream]

[billva]

That is *not* a given, and you know it. We've gone through this "lesser of two evils" time and again, much to our detriment. When does it stop? Never?

the infowarrior

Here's what I know, your answer is a blueprint for disaster.

I'm tired of people with your attitude that if you can't have exactly what you want you will stay home and pout.

So do it, but your attitude is dangerous and I think you know that.