Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qbert
Ultimately, I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

What exactly does this clown think the responsibilities of the Court are? To rubber-stamp every piece of legislation that gets passed in Congress? To fill the extra seats during a SOTU address?

9 posted on 04/03/2012 8:24:27 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a filibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lou L

Well, actually, that “reviewing” stuff was OK for all Presidents prior to this one. But once ‘I Won’ took over those pesky justices were supposed to know their place and question nothing that ‘I Won’ does. His definition of strong majority must closely resemble Bill Clinton’s definition of “is” and “sex”, huh?


17 posted on 04/03/2012 8:46:38 AM PDT by RonInNaples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson