[af_vet_rr]

Time to get over it and either find something to like about Mitt and get behind his nomination or just vote for him as a total anti-Obama vote.

Seeing him as the anti-Obama vote is just an excuse, not a reason, to vote for him. In the end, you're still voting for a liberal.

Going back to 1988, we've had nothing but moderate/liberal Republican nominees who are there because it's "their turn" or because they have the most money, or both, and their accomplishments since 1988 consist of expanding the size, cost, and power of the government, losing to Democrats, or opening up the way for their successors to lose to Democrats.

Mitt Romney would be a fine addition to that 24 year collection of liberal Republicans, but he'll be doing it without my vote. I'm done voting for liberal Republicans simply because they got the nomination.

[wallcrawlr]

Using your example that’s 25 years of history.
Might be time to recognize reality and not stomp away in frustration. Even Rush said any of the Repub nominees are better then the current Illinois refuge President. It’s true no matter how much you may have preferred one over the other.

Besides, its more important to do what you can to vote decent conservatives at the local level. From that base maybe a decent Presidential nominee will appear!