Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boop

I still think that Lee was one of the best generals in Western history but lacked the resources the North had. He inspired his men to fight, they stuck with him, even when they were starving and barefoot,and even where there no hope of victory.


9 posted on 04/04/2012 12:45:44 AM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: U-238
Agree. Lee was a genius, who anticpated what the North would do. He just didn't have the resources. Gave me a whole new appreciation for what he COULD have done.

If he had the abilty, the Confederacy could have conceivably won.

But that's another argument for another day.

14 posted on 04/04/2012 1:15:54 AM PDT by boop (I hate hippies and dopeheads. Just hate them. ...Ernest Borgnine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: U-238

Missouri was kept in the union by the German immigrants in St. Louis. They formed enough units to hold enough territory long enough to make a difference.


72 posted on 04/04/2012 7:14:19 AM PDT by x_plus_one (Jihad is an institution inherent to the Islamic system itself; a permanent religious obligation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: U-238
“I still think that Lee was one of the best generals in Western history...”

I couldn't agree more. Lee was a brilliant star 15 years before the Civil War in the Mexican-American War (1846) with innovation, competence and personal bravery. Grant was in the thick of things but didn't rise up to the star level. Another notable battle field leader in the first half of the war was Jefferson Davis.

116 posted on 04/04/2012 5:48:10 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson