Why is the time for an answer set to Thursday?
Seems to me that instead of a 2-day response time, 4 or 5 minutes would be more appropriate. Actually, the time needed to say “1803” would be quite sufficient.
“Why is the time for an answer set to Thursday?”
BFD. The king need not answer to anyone. Thursday will simply come and go as usual.
Problem is that the Presidient of the US seems to be saying that the judicial branch is not co-equal because they are "un-elected". And, the president does not seem to agree with the DOJ lawyers opinion.
Requesting official clarification from her bosses seems warranted.
Plus, it makes Obama look like the snotty school kid - given a homework asignment by the wise professor judge.
Should make Eric Holder write it 100 times on the chalk board too.
This is actually starting to worry me. First those idiot Senators came out with the not-worth-obeying crap if the ruling didn’t go their way. Then Bozo with the unelected speech and a couple of honorable mentions for impeaching the Justices scattered about.
I read where the Judge who ordered this response is an Obama appointee so is this another setup? Could the judges just accept the answer on Thurs. as valid and drop that case? Just wondering out loud here.
“Why is the time for an answer set to Thursday?”
Maybe they will fast track unfavorable cases in 5th Circuit of MS, LA or TX (eligibility or such?), but just not saying so?
I think the time, plus the length mandate, was to force the DoJ to actually put some effort into it and remind them of how things are supposed to work.
Why is the time for an answer set to Thursday?
Seems to me that instead of a 2-day response time, 4 or 5 minutes would be more appropriate. Actually, the time needed to say “1803” would be quite sufficient.
Courts are closed in Good Friday.