Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This court, cosseted behind white marble pillars, out of reach of TV, accountable to no one once they give the last word...

I'm no Constitutional scholar like MoDo or President Urkel but, technically speaking, I believe there is a way to override a decision made by this "group of unelected people."

I think a 2/3 majority of The House can negate an S.C. decision.

And, of course, there is always the impeachment process.

Or, am I missing the spirit of this thread?

22 posted on 04/04/2012 6:36:44 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Eagle
I think a 2/3 majority of The House can negate an S.C. decision.

This is not correct. There is no appeal and no override of a supreme court decision, except possibly via a reversal by a subsequent supreme court.

Once the supreme court declares a law unconstitutional, the only thing congress can do to achieve the goals of that law is to pass a similar law which is different enough so that it is not unconstitutional.

If the supreme court declares the individual mandate unconstitutional, I think coming up with a new 'constitutional' version of the law will be very difficult for congress to achieve; at least without adopting a government controlled health care system set up similarly to 'social security;' (Obama's beloved 'single payer system'). Of course, it's entirely possible that this has been the goal all along.

44 posted on 04/04/2012 6:55:15 AM PDT by WayneS (Comments now include 25% more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson