Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney’s Vicious Attack Ads Against Conservatives May Doom Romney Now or in November
Conservative HQ ^ | 4-4-12 | Richard A. Viguerie

Posted on 04/04/2012 7:34:47 PM PDT by VinL

Coming off of his primary wins in liberal Maryland and DC and a relentlessly negative campaign in Wisconsin, Mitt Romney’s campaign has signaled to the other candidates for the Republican nomination for President that there will be no let-up in the negative tenor of his campaign going into Pennsylvania and the other spring primaries. Mitt Romney As Bloomberg’s Heidi Przybyla noted, the “defining feature of the 2012 Republican presidential primary race” has been Romney’s relentlessly negative campaign. According to Przybyla’s research, “Since the contests began, Restore Our Future has spent $35 million on commercials attacking Santorum and Newt Gingrich” and “just $1.1 million promoting Romney.”

According to Przybyla’s reporting, Kantar Media's Campaign Media Analysis Group, Romney’s super PAC Restore Our Future aired 16 negative ads 41,612 times in GOP primary states such as Michigan, Florida and Colorado.

Romney’s negative ads, many of them factually questionable, have carpet bombed the conservatives in the race. As Romney has unleashed this wave of negativity, the campaigns of conservatives from Rick Perry, to Michele Bachmann, to Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich have withered, leaving Rick Santorum as the last conservative standing to bear the brunt of Romney’s attacks.

However, these attacks have done nothing to build support for Mitt Romney, especially among movement conservatives, and to the extent that Romney can claim front runner status it is because he has come to be seen as the “least worst” alternative by rank-and-file Republican primary voters.

Romney’s campaign has already made clear that it will employ the same hard-edged tactics that he used to crush Newt Gingrich in Florida and overtake Santorum in Michigan, Ohio, Illinois and Wisconsin, to defeat Santorum in his home state of Pennsylvania.

Whether Romney’s slime machine campaign will work against Santorum in Pennsylvania remains to be seen – it didn’t work against Gingrich in his home state of Georgia where Newt buckled down and ran like he was running for county sheriff to neutralize the charge that he was an out of touch Washington insider.

Even if one accepts the fuzzy math that Romney claims puts him half way to the 1,144 delegates he needs to clinch the Republican nomination – and we don’t – his negative campaign has left him with a substantial enthusiasm deficit, and no real base upon which to mount a winning campaign against Barack Obama.

As long as Romney relies solely on negative advertising to tear down his more conservative Republican opponents, without making the positive case for his own bona fides to be the Republican standard-bearer, conservatives will have little reason to support him.

Given the huge hole that leaves in the Republican base, the other candidates should prepare to stay in the race all the way to Tampa, knowing that if Romney’s delegate count doesn’t give him the nomination on the first ballot, conservatives whom he has failed to convince during the primaries will continue to look for an alternative until the roll is called and the last vote is counted.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; gingrich; nevertrustromney; romneyattacksgop; romneysucks; viciousromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Lazlo in PA
Romney is the one who has singlehandedly ...blah, blah, ...can screw.

And what does Mark say after he gets done telling everyone how bad Romney is?

"We have to vote against Obama and for the Republican nominee."

61 posted on 04/04/2012 8:28:16 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Come August 27th nobody is going to remember squat about what ads were run in the primary. Once the Key note speakers at the convention take stage, and maybe we see another Palin like speech by the VP, from that point it will be all about sending Obama back to Chicago.
62 posted on 04/04/2012 8:28:25 PM PDT by NavyCanDo (You can take an idiot out of Chicago, but you canÂ’t take the Chicago out of an idiot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
Come August 27th nobody is going to remember squat about what ads were run in the primary. Once the Key note speakers at the convention take stage, and maybe we see another Palin like speech by the VP, from that point it will be all about sending Obama back to Chicago.

We all saw how well that worked for McCain last time in 2008 and Romney is orders of magnitude worse than McCain and he doesn't have the War Hero thing going for him. In fact, Romney, with his left-wing Progressive Liberal record, makes McCain look conservative.

Wishful thinking and hope on your part isn't going to get it done.

Sarah, as good as she is, couldn't get it done in 2008.

Romney will lose in epic landslide proportions because of Romney.
63 posted on 04/04/2012 8:31:45 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

I didn’t know we had a nominee yet. Until I have to chose the orange juice can, I am fighting against Milt.


64 posted on 04/04/2012 8:35:56 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: garjog

“Why are people voting for this weenie?”

Which weenie, blue jeans/buttondown or sweatervest?


65 posted on 04/04/2012 9:11:05 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: citizen

“Romney’s ads will play just fine against Obama.”

Establishment R’s don’t attack progressives. They attack conservatives.


66 posted on 04/04/2012 9:17:44 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

“Do not fool yourself into thinking that Santorum and Newt wouldn’t have run vicious attack ads against Romney,...”

Mis Marple forgets it was Romney that fired the first shots back in December, and those ads were as close to outright fabrications as it gets.

Don’t try to excuse Romney of responsibilty for what he has done by saying Santorum and Gingrich WOULD have done it. That simply does not excuse what Romney ACTUALLY did to destroy party unity.


67 posted on 04/04/2012 9:18:04 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: citizen

Karl Rove Approves of This Message (for Romney)

68 posted on 04/04/2012 10:06:52 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Archiving the most VIRULENT, FACT-FILLED Anti-Romney FR Articles (So Many of them) For Later Release)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I cannot consider a nominee for the GOP who crafted Obamacare initially, or supported gay marriage and assailed Ronald Reagan, to be a conservative and a patriot.


69 posted on 04/04/2012 10:09:56 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Archiving the most VIRULENT, FACT-FILLED Anti-Romney FR Articles (So Many of them) For Later Release)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: VinL

When did conservative become such crybabies?


70 posted on 04/04/2012 10:21:56 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

It sounds like Romney doesn’t pull any punches. If he attacks Obama with anything like this kind of fervor, it should be interesting to see whether he can make a dent in the Messiah’s numbers. I’m a Santorum guy, but I’ve always been curious as to whether McCain could have won in 2008 if he (1) hadn’t signed on for Federal financing, thereby ensuring he would be outspent 3 to 1 and (2) had relentlessly attacked Obama for his radical connections, instead of holding back in the interest of an unfair and one-sided “civility”. I think there are two ways for Romney to get the base energized. One is to pick a conservative VP - Ryan, Rubio, Palin, Santorum or Gingrich would do it. Another is to pick a non-conservative, but go nuclear on Obama, the way he went after his opponents in the GOP primaries.


71 posted on 04/04/2012 10:23:07 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

One thing’s for sure - whomever the nominee is, this cycle will be replete with Super PAC money ready to match Obama dollar for dollar in terms of negative ads. Can money parity alone win 2012 for the GOP? Given the lack of charisma among all the GOP candidates (with the exception of Cain), I think we’re about to find out.


72 posted on 04/04/2012 10:27:49 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

I think you hit it on the head. In the deabtes, they all went after each other, which means they dont have a problem with negative. Just mad that Romney had more money. Im not going to play the class warfare game.


73 posted on 04/04/2012 10:30:21 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

They are both politicians, so that would support it. They both went negative in the debates, which supports it as well.


74 posted on 04/04/2012 10:32:35 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
They are both politicians, so that would support it.

That is the most oblique reason you could ever give.
75 posted on 04/04/2012 10:41:06 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
They both went negative in the debates, which supports it as well.

1. When Romney goes negative he lies and spins.
2. When either Newt or Rick goes negative, for the vast majority of the time, they don't, in fact, they have enough ammo with Romney's lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal record that they don't need to.
3. When Newt's ads went astray, he had them corrected.

No comparison at all.

And using the term negative to describe accurately the telling of Romney's record is the game of the left, not conservatives.
76 posted on 04/04/2012 10:43:41 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; af_vet_1981
I cannot consider a nominee for the GOP who crafted Obamacare initially, or supported gay marriage and assailed Ronald Reagan, to be a conservative and a patriot.

He didn't just support Gay Marriage, he implemented it single-handledly in an unconstitutional manner without the Legislature.

Furthermore he implemented a Cap and Trade system and an "Assault" weapons ban.

Romney IS the 2nd cousin to Obama in terms of policies and actions.
77 posted on 04/04/2012 10:46:54 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Any pro-lifer who ever votes for Romney is a hypocrite.


78 posted on 04/04/2012 10:48:54 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Fine, live in the bubble. Everything you dont like is a lie, the people you dont like are lying, and your people dont lie.


79 posted on 04/04/2012 10:51:11 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
Fine, live in the bubble. Everything you dont like is a lie, the people you dont like are lying, and your people dont lie.

The only people living in a bubble are those refusing to take a good hard look at the left-wing, Progressive Liberal record of Mitt Romney and then believing that he can somehow win against an extremely aggressive Obama and the Media both of which have no scruples whatsover over using that record of Mitt's to destroy his candidacy.

All you Mitt Supporters and Mitt himself have to offer is Hope and Not Much Change.

And Mitt Romney has a long way to go before he wraps up the nomination, and there is still a good chance he won't.
80 posted on 04/04/2012 10:55:33 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson