Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

I don’t understand why a foetis cannot be anesthetized before a necessary abortion.


5 posted on 04/06/2012 11:17:18 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin
They don't anesthetize the baby during abortions because to do so would be to acknowledge that the baby does feel pain. They want people to believe that it is simply a lump of flesh that can be casually disposed of.
7 posted on 04/06/2012 11:23:08 AM PDT by WMarshal (Bitter Clinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin
‘I don’t understand why a foetis cannot be anesthetized before a necessary abortion.’

They claim in utero Children can feel no pain.

The fact is that the “necessary Abortions” are statistically insignificant to the point that they almost do not exist. Only in the case of Ectopic Pregnancies, A true danger to the mothers life, The procedure of tube removal to relieve the condition actually causes an abortion as a necessary act to eliminate the Fallopian obstruction. Beyond that, there are almost NO necessary abortions.

The increase of medical testing a=has brought to hte forefront the naked selfishness of a vast amount of the human population. They are little more than animals or worse. We are the only species that a mother deliberately kills her in utero children and almost 100% of the time it is strictly convenience.

32 posted on 04/06/2012 12:48:48 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson