Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gas flaring permits surge in Texas
Fuel Fix ^ | April 9, 2012 | Simone Sebastian

Posted on 04/09/2012 12:34:17 PM PDT by thackney

The number natural gas flaring permits issued in Texas has more than quadrupled over the past two years, as oil and gas production in the state has boomed, according to the Texas Railroad Commission.

The state commission issued 651 permits last year, compared to 306 in 2010. In 2009, 158 permits were handed out.

Companies flare, or burn off, natural gas produced from their wells if low prices make the fossil fuel uneconomical to sell or if there’s not enough pipeline capacity to get to it market. Flaring also occurs to relieve dangerous pressure levels in wells and for other safety reasons.

The rapid increase in gas flaring is even more pronounced in North Dakota, where more than one-third of the fossil fuel is going up in smoke, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

A group of institutional investors recently released a letter to 21 oil and gas companies decrying the rise of flaring because of the environmental and financial impacts. The group specifically called out Texas and North Dakota for the problem.

“We are concerned that flaring of natural gas wastes a valuable product,” the letter reads. “Even at today’s depressed wellhead price, the 100 million cubic feet of natural gas that were flared each day in North Dakota last year represents approximately $110 million in lost revenue.”

The letter, which was sent to leaders of Anadarko, Apache, ExxonMobil, Marathon Oil, Chesapeake Energy, Noble Energy and other major producers, pointed to the proliferation of shale oil production as a key driver for flaring’s growth.

Ramona Nye, spokeswoman for the Texas Railroad Commission, says most of the flared gas in Texas comes from oil wells, where it is produced as a byproduct. While natural gas production has slowed because of its low price, oil drilling has boomed in Texas and across the country in recent years.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Dakota; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: energy; naturalgas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Over one-third of natural gas produced in North Dakota is flared or otherwise not marketed
http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=4030
NOVEMBER 23, 2011
1 posted on 04/09/2012 12:34:23 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


2 posted on 04/09/2012 12:35:31 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
We need the LNG export terminal in the Port of Corpus Christi ASAP

Cheniere to Develop LNG Export Terminal at Corpus Christi
Friday, December 16, 2011

3 posted on 04/09/2012 12:42:55 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I think many of our LNG import terminals are going to become export terminals.


4 posted on 04/09/2012 12:44:04 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That looks like....a hockey stick...


5 posted on 04/09/2012 12:47:17 PM PDT by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Srikes me as criminal wastage. This vitally important resource is not being “produced;” it is being released or extracted. It is bad enough that huge amounts of this gas, and petroleum, are used to make plastics (landfill stuffers)and fertilizers.
BTW, can any Freeper direct me to scientific publications that explain a process that could result in the production and the locational concentration of deposits of petroleum?


6 posted on 04/09/2012 12:56:28 PM PDT by Elsiejay (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

I don’t think it is going to last.

Natural gas flaring regulations:

According to current North Dakota state regulations, producers can flare natural gas for one year without paying taxes or royalties on it, and can ask for an extension on that period due to economic hardship of connecting the well to a natural gas pipeline. After one year, or when the extension runs out, producers can continue flaring but are responsible for the same taxes and royalties they would have paid if the natural gas went to market.


7 posted on 04/09/2012 12:57:01 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

A market for small scale GTL plants.

http://www.synfuels.com/


8 posted on 04/09/2012 12:57:41 PM PDT by Okieshooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsiejay
can any Freeper direct me to scientific publications that explain a process that could result in the production and the locational concentration of deposits of petroleum?

Can you explain more what you are looking for?

You talk about a process for production and for locational concentration of deposits?

Oil and gas are always sourced to sedimentary basins. Does that help?

9 posted on 04/09/2012 12:59:39 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney
A ton of these at each well head until some other transportation or utilization is implimented might be a big help. Microturbines to generate electricity...


10 posted on 04/09/2012 1:01:48 PM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Okieshooter

Gas-to-liquid technology is very unlikely to work at the well location. You need a clean source of gas, after the gas processing plant.

Wellhead gas contains varying amounts of CO2, H2S, water, Natural Gas Liquids, etc.

If it was piped up to a gas processing plant, this would no longer be an issue.


11 posted on 04/09/2012 1:02:18 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Okieshooter

Here is a new GTL process but I havent been able to find much on it so it may just be a pie in the sky.

http://www.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/stories/2007/04/09/story5.html


12 posted on 04/09/2012 1:02:35 PM PDT by Okieshooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

So they have to pay taxes on it, even if they would lose money bringing it to market. Wow...only government could come up with something so stupid.

Didn’t know that. Thanks.


13 posted on 04/09/2012 1:04:25 PM PDT by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Elsiejay
Strikes me as criminal wastage

Exactly.If the stories I've read are true the US and Canada both have obscene quantities of gas in reserve.Assuming that's true there's gotta be a way to use it for our benefit.

14 posted on 04/09/2012 1:05:50 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Jimmy Carter Is No Longer The Worst President To Have Served In My Lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Same problem as the GTL. You need to be downstream of a Gas Processing plant. Microturbines are going to be very unhappy in the typical gas well as direct fuel gas.


15 posted on 04/09/2012 1:06:38 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

Royalties as well I suspect.

That is what shut down a lot of gas flaring in many areas, including the Alaska North Slope.


16 posted on 04/09/2012 1:08:17 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Are the royalties and taxes the same for gas and oil?


17 posted on 04/09/2012 1:10:46 PM PDT by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“If it was piped up to a gas processing plant, this would no longer be an issue.”

Which brings back to the orginal problem that there are no pipelines. Depending on the gas perhaps processing of of the unwanted products could also be done on a small scale in the field. I understand that there would be a lot of variables as to if it would be feasable in a particular field or not.


18 posted on 04/09/2012 1:11:28 PM PDT by Okieshooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Okieshooter
Depending on the gas perhaps processing of of the unwanted products could also be done on a small scale in the field.

I don't think so. I've done work for a samll and large gas processing facility. Separating out the other components requires you to do something with almost all of the components. And the smaller the processing equipment, the less efficient that typically becomes. They require energy themselves. It would be just as more cost effective to run some low pressure HDPE pipe as to bring in electrical power lines and the scatter around processing equipment.

19 posted on 04/09/2012 1:15:48 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

The royalty rates are likely the same, percentage basis. The taxes I’m guessing would likely be lower for Natural Gas.


20 posted on 04/09/2012 1:17:10 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson