Replies

The birth certificate issue is the official straw man. The real issue is the FACT that for a citizen to have establish the degree affixed to being a natural born citizen, he or she must be, at the time of birth, TWO American citizens as parents. Obama's father was a British citizen in the British colony today called Kenya. Obama's mother had not yet attained the legal age of 18 in which she was eligible to pass on citizenship (that point I find hard to buy, though)

It is critial to the Obama administration that everyone keeps the birth certificate issue stewing to avoid the REAL disqualifier.

Forged BC and SS card not a disqualifier as well? Though I agree with you that O is not a NBC, therefor not eligible, but forgery is something the average Joe can clearly wrap his head around. Sheriff Arpaio is a God send.

‘Obama thugs history revealed in Michele Thomas Bettina Viviano interview, Obama stole 1996 Alice Palmer election and 2008 DNC primaries caucuses’

jbjd | April 9, 2012 at 9:50 am |
President Obama’s ballot eligibility problem is about to blow wide open. When it does, you will need to understand how to explain to your public officials that while they might (genuinely) believe he has released a bona fide copy of his long form birth certificate evidencing he was born in HI; and the HI DoH confirmed, it’s real; neither claim is true. On the contrary, this was all part of a well orchestrated political ad campaign, carried out in full compliance with applicable state and federal law.

RECOGNIZING when the PEOPLE INVOLVED with the PRESS ROLLOUT of PRESIDENT OBAMA’S 2011 LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AD CAMPAIGN WORE a PUBLIC v. PRIVATE HAT

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/obama-thugs-history-revealed-in-michele-thomas-bettina-viviano-interview-obama-stole-1996-alice-palmer-election-and-2008-dnc-primaries-caucuses/

Obama's mother had not yet attained the legal age of 18 in which she was eligible to pass on citizenship (that point I find hard to buy, though)

The point is valid, but it has been repeated in a misleading manner. The rules governing the ability of the mother to transfer citizenship ONLY APPLY to a birth in a foreign country. They DO NOT APPLY if he was born in the United States. The 14th Amendment applies in this circumstance. (Under one interpretation of it) Even so, the 14th amendment would only make him a "citizen", not a "natural born citizen."

A law cannot make someone "natural born" who is not. Were it otherwise, the Founders would have simply declared themselves "natural born" rather than add an exception for themselves in Article II.