Posted on 04/10/2012 6:28:49 AM PDT by marthemaria
Anders Behring Breivik was charged last month with committing acts of terror and voluntary homicide. He is accused of killing eight people in a bomb attack in Oslo, then going to Utoya Island outside the city and systematically gunning down 69 more people, many of them teens and young adults.
Breivik has pleaded not guilty, though he has admitted carrying out the attacks, according to the judge handling his case previously.
In November, prosecutors said psychiatrists had determined Breivik was paranoid and schizophrenic at the time of the attacks and during 13 interviews experts conducted with him afterward.
The Tuesday report said Breivik was not psychotic at the time of the crimes, does not suffer from a psychiatric condition and is not mentally challenged.
"There is a high risk for repeated violent actions," said the report from Terje Torrissen and Agnar Aspaas.
Breivik's trial is set for April 16 and is expected to last up to 10 weeks. If he is convicted, his punishment will be based on the determination of his sanity. It may not be possible for him to receive the maximum punishment if he is deemed insane.
Authorities have described Breivik as a right-wing Christian extremist. A 1,500-page manifesto attributed to him posted on the Internet is critical of Muslim immigration and European liberalism, including Norway's Labour Party.
Breivik showed some of his extremist views during a February hearing, which began with him entering court with a smile and offering up a raised, clenched-fist salute.
He insists nobody could believe that he was insane, and describes questions about his mental condition as ridiculous, his attorney has said.
Breivik claims the shooting rampage was a matter of self-defense, meant to save Norway from being taken over by multicultural forces and to prevent ethnic cleansing of Norwegians, Lippestad said.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Obviously he’s not sane but, if sending him to trial as sane increases the SOB’s punishment, I’m all for it.
“Fjordman from Gates of Vienna”?
He never advocated violence toward muslims. But has been in hiding ever since Breivik’s murder spree because of serious death threats.
No sane person would defend Breivik, but most of the observations of Fjordman were accurate.
Europe is in serious danger of being subjected by Islam.
Does Obozo think he is going to do the same to the U.S.?
Guess we shall see.
Islamaphobia is not paranoia. The nature of Islam is a direct threat to all free men.
Maximum punishment?
Take him out and execute him now.
Wrong. The war is Islam against the freedom of religion common in the West. Most of the Christians in Europe do not understand that they are under assault. But they are none the less.
Do you suggest that Islam has not made war against all free people? The definition of "peace" within Islam is actually "subjection". Oddly the exact same end that the Left intends. Is there any wonder why they are now allied (at least in the minds of the Left).
Anders Breivik knew exactly what he was doing, planned his near military quality operation expertly, and executed it without a fault. In doing so, he has single-handed altered the future course of his nation, possibly preserving its culture and people from an extensive conspiracy that sought to destroy both.
For all intents and purposes, the Workers’ Youth League (AUF) of the Labour Party, which he about wiped out, was created as a socialist-communist effort to duplicate the German Hitler Jugend, established about 5 years before.
The purpose of both was to create an ideologically pure leadership of their respective socialist organizations to become future governments and carry out their philosophies with minimal debate, argument or dissension.
In the case of the AUF, as part of the Labour Party, with its official affiliation with the Socialist International.
In practical terms, this means that they are anti-nationalists, with no patriotism at all, and want to destroy both the unique culture of their nation and the ethnic identity of their people. The end result being that nations become just “administrative districts”, populated with “generic people” ruled by a multi-district government. Achieving “equality” through homogeneity.
The nation of Norway is particularly vulnerable to these efforts, as it has a population of only 4.7 million. The members of the Socialist International believe that by encouraging extensive immigration, on the condition that the immigrants vote as a bloc for the local socialist party, they will achieve the dual goals of diluting the Norwegian race, language and culture and political power.
With a combination of largess they can enlist a large number of Norwegians to vote for them, and with the immigrant vote, they calculate a plurality in government, and eventually a majority, then finally an absolute majority, so that they may change a nation’s constitution in their favor, to guarantee their agenda in the future.
However, enter Anders Breivik, who noted a flaw in their scheme. The AUF, to achieve uniformity, must have a great mass meeting for organizational reasons. If he were to wipe out the vast majority of these future politicians and bureaucrats, it would severely cripple the Labour party and its anti-Norwegian agenda.
Having accomplished his mission, it was essential that he surrender and be captured alive. Were he to be killed, the socialist government could claim a conspiracy to further their agenda. Likewise, at trial, he was well aware that they would try very hard to declare him insane, “as no sane person would oppose the socialist agenda”.
But they have failed in this as well.
Last but not least, with considerable irony, the socialists are so “soft on crime” that there is neither a death penalty nor life imprisonment. The absolute *maximum* any prisoner can get as punishment is 21 years.
So at the age of 54 or so, Anders Breivik will leave prison.
By then, he hopes that his nation will have fully recovered from the socialist-communist menace, and he will be seen, if not as a hero, then as a wise savior of his people, who crippled an evil threat in their midst.
I confess that I have mixed emotions about the deeds of Mr. Breivik. It was a colossal and murderous horror, to be sure, but I can understand his hatred of the communists/socialists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.