Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConfidentConservative
I would have voted for Cain, but once he dropped out I looked at the other candidates to support.

Because today, with the loss of Rick, there are no other candidates left. I guess you missed it Sunday on Face the Nation where Newt supported Romney. They are both grandfathers you know. Newt is done. Cain endorsed Romney today for crying out loud. Voting for Santorum now in his home state is more a show of support for the tough fight he fought and a screw you to Milt than anything important.

BTW, Newt is running at 5% here in the Keystone State. He isn't even going to beat Paul here.

139 posted on 04/10/2012 7:05:44 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Lazlo in PA; All; napscoordinator; writer33; Antoninus; AmericanInTokyo; cripplecreek; Mariner; ...
Lazlo’s post is right.

Here's Herman Cain's endorsement of Mitt Romney.

Herman Cain drops Newt Gingrich, ready to back Mitt Romney
By MJ LEE | 4/10/12 11:47 AM EDT
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/74986.html

This is obviously bad news for those of us who would like to see a unified anti-Romney front. Does anyone have good information on whether Perry and Palin are still backing Gingrich, and how Bachmann is leaning?

We can expect they'll all say they'll back the eventual Republican nominee; to say anything else at this point is political suicide. What counts is what they're saying about pre-convention endorsements. If we get chaos at the convention, we may see national political figures decide to back someone else or withhold their endorsement — just like Mitt Romney's own father did when Goldwater won the nomination — but it's too early to expect things like that today.

I've been on the phone and email most of today with some key “influencers” who, now that Santorum has dropped out, are on the fence about supporting Gingrich or Romney, and doing in-person politicking as well. Let's just say this has been a really bad day for me and a lot of other people I know, and I'm not happy with what I'm hearing.

By focusing on politics for the last week or so, I'm doing some pretty serious damage to my business since I really should be doing other things, but I'm doing it because I truly believe a Romney nomination is a disaster for America. I do not want to say in November, if Obama wins re-election, that I might have been able to make a few more phone calls or answer a few more questions in April and May, but didn't do so when I still had a chance to do something, however small, in my own little sphere of influence and contacts, to stop Romney's nomination.

The stakes really are that high if Romney is the nominee.

As I said to a certain pro-life lawyer today, with Romney the best we can expect is to see more nominees like David Souter or Sandra Day O'Connor. Granted, that's better than Kagan and Sotomayor, but a bad Supreme Court nominee can cause damage for decades down the road.

140 posted on 04/10/2012 8:03:20 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson