This makes no sense to me. There is no question that Obama is as pro-choice as it gets, including partial birth abortion. There is no reasoned argument that the reelection of Obama will lessen the number of abortions compared to the election of Romney, and pretty decent reasons to assume the opposite.
As for the argument that it was the supreme court that allowed this, with the rampant abuse of executive orders, what’s to stop Romney from using that with regards to abortion or homosexual marriage?
That makes no legal sense at all. Executive orders cannot bar a state from outlawing abortion, not do they last beyond the term of the President in question. Supreme Court decisions, however, survive until overruled. How's that working out with Roe v. Wade?
“This makes no sense to me. There is no question that Obama is as pro-choice as it gets, including partial birth abortion.”
I did not vote for Obama. My hands are clean. I have said before, if our country is so gone that so called conservatives and Christians will vote for pro abortion, $50 abortion, Romney, then the country deserves the judgement it gets from God under the government they elect. I’ll stay under the shadow of God’s wings, thanks. Sadly, unless we Nineveh up pretty quick, it seriously isn’t going to matter whether we get Romney or Obamoa. We’ll be judged.