Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny

A win for Obama is a win for Obama. No one will care that he won by a plurality. The media will call it a mandate and we will be stuck with a Communist responsible to no one and the legacy of 3 leftist Supreme Court judges. That does not sound like tasty lemonade to me.


1,118 posted on 04/11/2012 12:00:25 PM PDT by BizBroker (Democrats- Don't want 'em, Don't need 'em, Can't use 'em, Couldn't afford 'em if I did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies ]


To: BizBroker
No one will care that he won by a plurality.

So, are you first cousin to Chicken Little? When Clinton won with 43 percent plurality, he got his ASS KICKED in the mid-terms. And in case you haven't been paying attention to Romney's record in Massachusetts, his judical appointments were extremely activist liberal every three out of four picks. Obama picks a liberal, at least empowered conservatives can fight it tooth and nail; Romney picks a Souter, Republican opposition will be made much weaker.

Conservatives would at least become more powerful under Obama; under Romney, they would be castrated and YOU will have done your part in voting away the last hope of fighting liberalism by voting to surrender the Republican party to liberalism. Wake up, FRiend.

1,134 posted on 04/11/2012 12:54:30 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson