Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EDINVA
Just how did they violate the attorney-client privilege? They gave no details or even discussed Zimmerman’s case.

For one thing they speculated about their clients mental state on national television. The mere fact they held a news conference to announce their departure was an ethical breech.

49 posted on 04/11/2012 4:14:29 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck

The attorneys speculated about Zimmerman’s current mental state, based on his behavior in refusing to communicate with them. They did not speculate about his mental state at the time he shot Martin. There is no ethical violation in holding a press conference for what has been made into the biggest legal media story of the moment.

How about Martin’s attorney threatening the special prosecutor with “pandemonium,” i.e., riots, if she doesn’t file charges? In a media interview for a foreign news outlet, no less.


51 posted on 04/11/2012 5:41:10 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson