Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steelfish

The meanings of political labels shift over time, but if we are using the term “conservative” in its historical context, Santorum is one of the most conservative candidates that we have seen since at least Buchanan (I hope I’m not forgetting anyone obvious,) and probably will see for a long time.


10 posted on 04/10/2012 5:40:38 PM PDT by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WPaCon
The meanings of political labels shift over time, but if we are using the term “conservative” in its historical context, Santorum is one of the most conservative candidates that we have seen since at least Buchanan (I hope I’m not forgetting anyone obvious,)

Yes, you forgot someone obvious who is far and away more conservative. If you can pass more conservative legislation under a Democrat president than the other guy could under a Republican president, that definitely makes you more conservative.


19 posted on 04/10/2012 5:51:46 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

“The meanings of political labels shift over time, but if we are using the term “conservative” in its historical context, Santorum is one of the most conservative candidates that we have seen since at least Buchanan (I hope I’m not forgetting anyone obvious,) and probably will see for a long time.”

Even freepers thought he was too conservative for them.

It will now be a competition between Obama and Romney as to who will mandate the most free birth control pills and gay rights.


29 posted on 04/10/2012 6:10:23 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson