Not a good thing, cutting workforce at flint hills, but I thought I read production would stay the same. Might have to do with making the place more efficient with less overhead. I’ve seen that happen in Alaska more times than not. They might be wanting some tax relief too; might hear more down the road. I once heard somebody mention that the state should buy flint hills and develop it themselves, but nobody wants another state failure. Having a refinery here might be crucial for Alaska also.
The production through unit #1 will stop. The production through unit #2 will continue. The will still deliver products but less of them.