Oh, I thought you understood that already. Sorry, here's my problem...
"Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesn’t even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue.""I’ve stated many times since Romney started running for the presidency way back when that I’d never vote for him and I will not. He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike."
...I agree with that. Because it is 100% true and not even the tip of the iceberg.
It is a fallacy to think if something is not as bad as something else then it must be good.
All it is less bad. Maybe very bad but still less.
All I said is that I would chose to vote for the less bad IF I HAD NO OTHER CHOICE rather than vote for the MOST BAD. By voting this way only does one thing. It gives one less vote to the MOST BAD. It does not change the fact that I do not like not trust Romney, only the I dislike obummer and trust him less.
It is all relative.
And we as Conservatives should be ASHAMED that we are 7 months out from a huge election with nothing that even looks Conservative.
I am ashamed. We did the same thing McCain and we are doing it again.
And we wonder why they laugh at us.
Perhaps if we can get the convention brokered and get Newt back in with a monumental groundswell of support, then we might have reason to be somewhat hopeful. Until then, not so much. Not good is it