Not quite:
A man who is DECEIVED by that 'church'.
A man who CAN'T look at the data his 'church' has produced over the years and see it's faults.
A man whose logical and reasoning abilities are so diminished that I, for one, would NOT consider him to be presidential material.
If you’re going to apply logic and reason to religious issues, you’re buying into unending discourse. On their face no religion will stand up to rationalogical analysis. None. They exist in a different realm.