Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
they’d still be killing babies.

By voting for one who supports it, you are just as liable as they are. Everything is written down - there is no escaping it as it's not hidden. HE knows ALL.

159 posted on 04/13/2012 8:19:29 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: presently no screen name

As I sasid earlier, I won’t vote candidates who do not state a pro-life position.

It is why I was not one of those who supported Scott Brown here during the Obamacare fight, even though I understood the importance of his election. I couldn’t send money to someone who voiced an opinion that killing was OK.

Now, as a practical matter, I’ve voted for candidates who were pro-life but not all the way back to conception. Politically, those candidates would do as much as any elected person could do on the matter. I prefer more pure pro-lifers who don’t make exception for rape and incest, but I have voted for a rape/incest murderer before, because again they were supporting every law we could get passed that would make it through supreme court review.

If Romney is our nominee (and he is not yet), I will be able to cast a vote for him, because he has a stated pro-life position. I’d prefer a candidate who had a better, longer record of pro-life. Santorum was very good in that regard, as was Rick Perry.


171 posted on 04/13/2012 8:35:29 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson