: )
Posted on 04/13/2012 5:25:01 PM PDT by Steelfish
To Beat Obama, Mitt Romney Must Channel Rick Santorum
Ralph Reed April 13
History, we are assured, is written by the winners. But when it comes to American presidential politics, the losers have plenty of say.
Rick Santorum’s exit from the Republican presidential contest this past week cleared the way for Mitt Romney to win the party’s nomination.
But over the course of a low-budget campaign that relied almost entirely on volunteers and was met with disdain by the GOP establishment, Santorum won more than 3 million votes and 11 state primaries — the most by a conservative insurgent candidate since Ronald Reagan challenged President Gerald Ford in 1976.
Santorum has been denounced as a sore loser, a religious extremist, a crank. MSNBC host Martin Bashir referred to him as a theocratic version of Stalin. One columnist alleged in the Daily Beast that Santorum would use the power of the presidency to impose “his ideal of a Christian America” on the nation. The New Yorker compared him to Islamic extremists who seek to execute their opponents, adding that we need separation of church and state so that “Santorum and his party can’t impose dominion of one narrow, sectarian, Bible-based idea of the public good.”
But Santorum and his supporters may have the last laugh. From John C. Fremont to William Jennings Bryan in the 19th century to Barry Goldwater, Eugene McCarthy, George McGovern and Ronald Reagan in our time, losing presidential candidates have previewed the ideological trajectory of their parties — and often of the nation.
Romney would be wise to remember this in his general-election campaign. Of course he can’t neglect independents, or women, or Hispanics, or other nontraditional Republican constituencies. But his immediate task is to consolidate conservative support and unify the party. The best way to do....
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Alienate away.
If Obama hasn’t done it by now, I will refrain from a long list, what more possible does he have to do for you to vote for Mitt.
: )
“After the election, I will be a vocal supporter of conservative causes”.
Good luck with that one. You’ll be vocalizing about conservative causes only in the shower if the RNC and Romney have anything to say about it.
They will draw you in, try to convince you that Mittens is in fact a bona fide “conservative’ who has your best interests at heart...and then they will both throw the Tea Party and Conservatives under the bus so fast, you won’t know what hit you.
Now is not the time to support a flaming Rino and then hope he’ll change. He won’t...
Now IS the time to stand up for Constitutional principles, no matter what it takes.
That’s why Rick Santorum was such a good candidate. He presented enough of a contrast with radical socialism to defeat it.
Romney is a liberal in moderate clothing...doesn’t have a conservative bone in his deceitful, dishonorable body.
>> Alienate away.
Don’t expect me to walk on political eggshells. If the possible alternative of a Newt nomination isn’t enough to motivate the so-called conservatives, than why bother stroking their egos?
Go Newt — the 1st and 3rd Party candidate!!!
Mittens didn’t have to put forth a liberal agenda, nor implement homosexual marriage-which was foisted upon the nation because of his actions.
Mitten didn’t have sign into law nor support Romneycare? Did he.
Better to be a “do nothing” governor in a leftist state, than an activist progressive-big government RINO!
Mittens didn’t have to put forth a liberal agenda, nor implement homosexual marriage-which was foisted upon the nation because of his actions.
Mitten didn’t have sign into law nor support Romneycare? Did he.
Better to be a “do nothing” governor in a leftist state, than an activist progressive-big government RINO!
He'd better channel someone, because the more voters get a look at Romney, the more they don't like.
“Treason doth never prosper
What’s the reason?
For if it prosper,
None dare call it treason!
On Treason—Sir John Harrington
And your alternative that has a realistic chance is......?
(cricket....cricket)
There's been plenty of that this season.
Pure speculation: I think that IF Romney gets the nod, he will go "McCain" by selecting one of these three or someone else of that caliber for VP. My preference is Alan West. Aside from leadership ability, he has demographics; he is black (garners 1/3 black voters and neutralizes the race gap) and from Florida (pulls a swing state); and he will be primed to continue a Repub presidency. Win-win-win. Besides, seeing the left go bananas at a West VP nominee will be worth the entertainment value alone.
Too much baggage, too much gender gap, He’s toast.
Romney has more baggage and is the same basic age as Newt. If Romney can make it, so can Newt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.