Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unkus

I thought the purpose of all this anti-romney stuff was to establish that he is the most evil of the bunch.. Since we are down to two choices (both evil, but Romney is worse) then “the lesser of two evils=Obama”). Is my logic out of whack? Of course, I would prefer Newt, but preference at this point is sort of useless.


40 posted on 04/14/2012 6:43:38 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Goreknowshowtocheat

(both evil, but Romney is worse) then “the lesser of two evils=Obama”).


Are you serious? Romney is more evil than 0bama???????


43 posted on 04/14/2012 6:51:59 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
“the lesser of two evils=Obama”) . . . Of course, I would prefer Newt, but preference at this point is sort of useless.

.

BLASPHEMER!

.

.

44 posted on 04/14/2012 6:58:01 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (This place is nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

I thought the purpose of all this anti-romney stuff was to establish that he is the most evil of the bunch.. Since we are down to two choices (both evil, but Romney is worse) then “the lesser of two evils=Obama”). Is my logic out of whack? Of course, I would prefer Newt, but preference at this point is sort of useless.


Please disregard my previous post about Romnry being more evil than 0bama. I get your point.

I also prefer Newt.

Churchill said he’d put in a good word for the devil if Hitler invaded hell.


45 posted on 04/14/2012 7:00:13 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson