I thought the purpose of all this anti-romney stuff was to establish that he is the most evil of the bunch.. Since we are down to two choices (both evil, but Romney is worse) then “the lesser of two evils=Obama”). Is my logic out of whack? Of course, I would prefer Newt, but preference at this point is sort of useless.
(both evil, but Romney is worse) then the lesser of two evils=Obama).
Are you serious? Romney is more evil than 0bama???????
.
.
.
I thought the purpose of all this anti-romney stuff was to establish that he is the most evil of the bunch.. Since we are down to two choices (both evil, but Romney is worse) then the lesser of two evils=Obama). Is my logic out of whack? Of course, I would prefer Newt, but preference at this point is sort of useless.
I also prefer Newt.
Churchill said he’d put in a good word for the devil if Hitler invaded hell.