Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Downside of Cohabiting Before Marriage
New York Times ^ | April 14, 2012 | Meg Jay

Posted on 04/14/2012 5:44:08 PM PDT by reaganaut1

...

In a nationwide survey conducted in 2001 by the National Marriage Project, then at Rutgers and now at the University of Virginia, nearly half of 20-somethings agreed with the statement, “You would only marry someone if he or she agreed to live together with you first, so that you could find out whether you really get along.” About two-thirds said they believed that moving in together before marriage was a good way to avoid divorce.

But that belief is contradicted by experience. Couples who cohabit before marriage (and especially before an engagement or an otherwise clear commitment) tend to be less satisfied with their marriages — and more likely to divorce — than couples who do not. These negative outcomes are called the cohabitation effect.

Researchers originally attributed the cohabitation effect to selection, or the idea that cohabitors were less conventional about marriage and thus more open to divorce. As cohabitation has become a norm, however, studies have shown that the effect is not entirely explained by individual characteristics like religion, education or politics. Research suggests that at least some of the risks may lie in cohabitation itself.

As Jennifer and I worked to answer her question, “How did this happen?” we talked about how she and her boyfriend went from dating to cohabiting. Her response was consistent with studies reporting that most couples say it “just happened.”

“We were sleeping over at each other’s places all the time,” she said. “We liked to be together, so it was cheaper and more convenient. It was a quick decision but if it didn’t work out there was a quick exit.”

She was talking about what researchers call “sliding, not deciding.” Moving from dating to sleeping over to sleeping over a lot to cohabitation can be a gradual slope

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cohabitation; livinginsin; shackingup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: reaganaut1

If I were a young man, ideally I’d never marry a girl who would have sex out of wedlock.

Can’t trust such a girl that much—if she found a way to rationalize having illicit sex when it suits her, she’ll more easily find a way to rationalize cheating on her husband when it suits her, too.

And a girl who’ll live with a guy outside of marriage, is just plain weak-minded with little self-respect or just strange.


21 posted on 04/14/2012 6:46:22 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Don’t think too highly of women, do ya?


22 posted on 04/14/2012 6:54:57 PM PDT by stuartcr ("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Don’t think too highly of women, do ya?


23 posted on 04/14/2012 6:55:27 PM PDT by stuartcr ("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Don’t think too highly of women, do ya?

Not stupid women. I pity them.

24 posted on 04/14/2012 7:00:43 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (This place is nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: donna

If you call it Sin now, even some Church people get mad. My how we have grown.


25 posted on 04/14/2012 7:00:52 PM PDT by easternsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

>>”I am woman. Hear me roar.” <<

That’s what I tell my girls all the time.
YOU control the situation, YOU can save yourself for your husband, YOU need not ‘put out’ because that takes the control of your own body away.

Women lost so much.


26 posted on 04/14/2012 7:08:32 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman; doc1019
As my Dad's generation (and I) told my daughters, why would a guy ever buy a cow if you give him milk for free?

OTOH, eventually that "cow" may give you a calf. That's where character fails for many.

27 posted on 04/14/2012 7:12:30 PM PDT by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

female promiscuity is market driven.
Think of two high school dances,
1 with 100 females and 200 males
2-200 females and 100 males.
the female behavior at the dances will be radically different.
With so many college educated females and so few college educated males this promiscuity rears his ugly head and we have problems similar to what the african-american community faces today.


28 posted on 04/14/2012 7:15:20 PM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
As my Dad's generation (and I) told my daughters, why would a guy ever buy a cow if you give him milk for free? Crude but effective.

Even cruder, and perhaps even more effective, would be:


29 posted on 04/14/2012 7:30:53 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Ha! I guess they don’t realize that living together is the worst part of being married. ;-)


30 posted on 04/14/2012 7:42:53 PM PDT by D_Idaho ("For we wrestle not against flesh and blood...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Many living-together couples, if asked why they do not marry, respond that marriage (license) is just a piece of paper. That begs the question: If it’s just a piece of paper, why the aversion to getting it?


31 posted on 04/14/2012 7:46:37 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Women lost so much.

They've given away their power.

32 posted on 04/14/2012 7:48:26 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (This place is nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Exactly what the article said, people move in together to split the bills and make sex easy. People get married because they want to spend the rest of their lives with one person.


33 posted on 04/14/2012 8:00:29 PM PDT by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

As one of those college educated, unmarried men I’d prefer anything other than the women I went to school with.

I tried that dating market, what’s the point? I was always the guy who got called when nobody else was available and you didn’t want to be seen in public.

I’ve had far more luck with women who actually appreciate kindness even if they were somewhat older. Far more luck.

So chalk me up to the statistics of yet another man checking out from the ‘college educated young woman’ market.


34 posted on 04/14/2012 8:01:54 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My husband and I celebrated our 15th wedding anniversary this past February. We will be together 25 years next June.....


35 posted on 04/14/2012 8:06:03 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easternsky
It's why voters love big government, because they are lonely and insecure - no family to depend on.
36 posted on 04/14/2012 8:10:22 PM PDT by donna (3rd largest workforce in the world: UK National Health Service (Chinese Army is #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

The same can be said of men..............and more so.


37 posted on 04/14/2012 8:13:02 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Many living-together couples, if asked why they do not marry, respond that marriage (license) is just a piece of paper. That begs the question: If it’s just a piece of paper, why the aversion to getting it?

My husband put of the piece of paper because he didn't want me to get hit with his problems with the IRS. We married within 6 months after that problem was solve.

38 posted on 04/14/2012 8:18:12 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

You speak for so many of the younger men I know. They don’t want any part of most of their female ‘peers’ who would (on paper) be their logical dating market. These men are going either for older women or for women from other countries who aren’t “liberated” in the American way.


39 posted on 04/14/2012 8:20:08 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Its all chemistry, the right mix will last forever. Too many of us marry strangers, even after long courtships, and find out later, it was a terrible mistake. Living with someone before marrying them doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t last. LOVE is the key, but are we still capable of it? Growing up in the late 60’s it was called free love, but it wasn’t love, it was just free sex. After a while, the great sex wears off, and if you thought it was love, it wasn’t. I’m sure any couple who is living together for 50+ years whether married or not, is an indication that there was chemistry and love.


40 posted on 04/14/2012 8:31:01 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft ( WHO WE ELECT AS PRESIDENT IS NOT AS IMPORTANT AS WHO THEY APPOINT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson