Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne

“”We don’t know who has the mortgage and no one seems to have any answers,” Feinson said. “

The cruxt of the problem, the banks can’t prove they have ownership of the property they are seeking to foreclose on.


2 posted on 04/15/2012 12:10:16 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver
The cruxt of the problem, the banks can’t prove they have ownership of the property they are seeking to foreclose on.

And when the responisble homeowners actually do pay off their mortagages, they will be in for an unpleasant surprise, when they find the bank that bought their bundled mortgage can't produce the note.

6 posted on 04/15/2012 12:53:28 PM PDT by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver

Of course this information is supposed to be filed at the county clerks office. But that costs money. This is one case where I would have to consider giving full legal ownership over to the homeowner.

The bankers are sitting on these for the reasons stated in the article. It is impossible for the homeowner to get out from under this obligation or to even find out what there obligations are when this is going on. Meanwhile the expenses continue to mount(Taxes and such)


7 posted on 04/15/2012 12:53:31 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver
In that case, doesn't the current owner have precedent?
19 posted on 04/16/2012 7:32:20 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson