Romney's almost certain to be the nominee, so why throw mud at him? What purpose would that serve? I know Romney's not ideal, but I'd vote for him if he was the candidate, and I put in a word every now and then when I see something that strikes me as unfair.
If there were some great conservative candidate in the race, or thinking about getting in the race, I'd support that candidate, though I'd hope that I wouldn't throw mud at the other candidates like you. But there isn't a candidate like that in the race or likely to enter it.
Politically active people have unrealistic expectations about what politics can do. They make allowances for politicians and build them up into things they aren't and can't be. Then they're disappointed and angry when the politicians inevitably don't measure up.
If you've already heard the worst about Romney maybe you won't be disappointed. You may even be pleasantly surprised. There must be some reason why Ann Coulter and other conservative talking heads support Mitt Romney. You may think you know things they don't, but I have to wonder sometimes if it's the other way around, and they know things you don't know and don't want to hear.
Yes a long term, obsessed romneybot, and a rambling poster as well, ammo? Catholics?
I often talk about voting, but I don’t recall talking about Catholicism or ammo.