Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBeers

That was exactly what I got from that.

I don’t know or care about his original study, but it doesn’t sound like he went back to the drawing board with his quiver of scientific method tools and came to a different conclusion.

It sounds more like he wants to wash his hands of it. Can’t say I blame him.


45 posted on 04/19/2012 8:09:04 PM PDT by rlmorel (A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel
That was exactly what I got from that. I don’t know or care about his original study, but it doesn’t sound like he went back to the drawing board with his quiver of scientific method tools and came to a different conclusion. It sounds more like he wants to wash his hands of it. Can’t say I blame him.

Exactly. I do not think the results of his study point to a finding that ALL homosexuals can change and be cured of the disorder. At best, the critiques, which involve the population sampled point to a conclusion that not as many may be successfully treated as the study implies.

HOWEVER, the homosexual sex promoters want to use this 'monumental earth shattering scientific retraction' as another springboard to use to continue promoting the fallacy that NO ONE CAN BE TREATED successfully, and as such, there is no reason to resist the self destructive activity, and further, since the disordered activity can not be resisted (automatons born that way) we must all embrace and promote it as good and wholesome -after all, penguins do it!

I say, balderdash!

51 posted on 04/19/2012 8:29:05 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson