Posted on 04/20/2012 3:57:46 AM PDT by Kaslin
George Bush received a lot of Hispanic votes in states where a “Cuban” is a cigar; Mexican-Americans liked him in Texas (for governor & president). He probably got more of the Hispanic vote than any Repub candidate in 20 years, and it went far beyond Florida.
“True, but it wouldn’t have happened without overwhelming cooperation from blacks.”
Absolutely; I don’t absolve blacks from this any more than I absolve whites that refuse to breed. Neither group has any right to complain about what is imported to replace them.
“And the Democrats have been promising them both Most Favored Minority status for 30 years.”
They have problems now in the NYC area, and they’re even more complex - the Caribbean & West African blacks have separate organizations from the American blacks, and they’re vying for the same political positions. Add the Hispanics on top of that, and the promises fall apart...
I agree. Especially when they are often the very same people who keep voting for Democrats.
Gee, that's kinda instrumental. When did you commoditize the human race? Can I buy a couple from you? (I like to hunt, and eat what I kill. It's very invigorating, both physically and spiritually.)
Not nearly as much as they liked Skerry and the Gorebot.
Bush's vote, even in Texas, topped out around 40% (meaning, 60% for the Rats). Furthermore, where he got a split better than 30% (which is typically the top vote a gringo will get from Texican Tejanos, who are Democrats almost to a man, he got it from South American and Central American immigrants and the occasional wandering Cubano. Tejano Democrats vote regularly and monotonously 70/30 Democratic, and they do it generation after generation -- to a degree that has drawn comment from political observers, who call them "culturally conservative" because, among other things, they tend to vote the way their grandfathers did, because their grandfathers did.
The canard that Bush et al. want to be "inclusive" by "appealing to Hispanic voters" is just camouflage for their real position, which is to hold the Government to an Open Borders policy, and "clemently" and "welcomingly" to bring in hordes of Mexicans to crush wages by working off-the-books (and off the company retirement and health plans), flooding community services and schools that are paid for by the voter-chumps.
What "decades"? You talking about the courts that ducked the issue with b.s. rhetoric about "standing"? Nobody has "standing" to challenge a political candidate on anything, something like that? (That seems to be the evolving Obama Doctrine, n/w/s the Dems vigorously challenged McCain on the same grounds.)
Romney/Rubio. R&R...RR Hope those initials serve us well.
“The canard that Bush et al. want to be “inclusive” by “appealing to Hispanic voters” is just camouflage for their real position, which is to hold the Government to an Open Borders policy, and “clemently” and “welcomingly” to bring in hordes of Mexicans to crush wages by working off-the-books (and off the company retirement and health plans), flooding community services and schools that are paid for by the voter-chumps.”
That is at least misprision in office, if not outright treason.
But not in Calif or NY - both with huge Hispanic populations. And pop goes your theory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.