Posted on 04/20/2012 8:54:37 AM PDT by MindBender26
You can say that again. He basically ambushed Dale Gilbreath, one of the investigators who signed the probably cause affidavit. Gilbreath didn't even know he was going to be testifying. It was stupid on his part to even be there.
I hope they do.
Not only that but the race baiters and the bpp for their bounty.
Imagine zimmerman owning their logo and trademark!
also a dismissal provides immunity from civil suit.
Actually, circumstantial means anything not eyewitness. No one saw the actual shooting (unless I missed that which is entirely possible). But, there is a lot of evidence to be sure. There were audio witnesses and witness after the fact, but no eyewitness of the shooting.
In fact, about 90% of all cases rely solely on circumstantial evidence.
Actually, circumstantial is not a bad thing. My fault for not clarifying what I meant by “circumstantial”. As I posted elsewhere, circumstantial is all evidence that is not an eyewitness to the shooting itself.
Sadly, television makes “circumstantial evidence” seem like some sort of lesser evidence. It is not and, in fact, is often much more reliable than eyewitness evidence.
My fault for not being more specific about what I mean.
Who says this person doesn’t have a video or pictures of the actual confrontation.
If it’s John (as in John Doe) the description of the incident sounded like he had some experience giving details....Could be he’s LEO or military trained. Taking pictures to protect GZ position was quick thinking regardless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.